Consumer Discretionary's Game of Chicken Vinny Catalano Aug 14, 2008 1:30 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Portfolios that benefited from being underweight Consumer Discretionary and Financials, the two sick men of the US economic sectors, were faced with a performance-related decision this summer: Play the potential counter trend rally or sit on the sidelines and watch relative performance suffer?
Take, for example, Consumer Discretionary. As the chart shows, the mega trend (price in relation to moving averages; moving averages in relation to each other and the slope of both moving averages) for it is solidly negative.

Click to enlarge
Yet, for the moment the counter trend move shows that it has been substantial enough to warrant a near even weighting.
If a managed portfolio was wisely underweight the sector and advocated the actively managed approach, the advisable decision would have been to increase the exposure to the sector at or around its recent oversold levels (similar to January of this year), when price was substantially below its 200 day moving average, for example.
(There are other, more “sophisticated” methods of measuring oversold/overbought levels: The above-referenced price to 200 day moving average is one rather simple method.)
Investment Strategy Implications
Regression to mean works both ways, for up and down trends. Overshooting is a common characteristic of trending markets. Counter moves occur that bring price back to its downtrend (regress to its mean) can be, at times, substantial.
For actively managed accounts, this presents the decision-making dilemma of whether to ride out the counter trend move (and lose some alpha) or play a game of chicken – knowing when to enter and then exit from a sector that you really don’t want to be in.
Getting in is largely a technical analysis decision – when an issue reaches a seriously enough oversold level (There are also other factors involved, including timing methodologies such as a divergence between price and momentum indicators).
The magnitude of getting in (how much to add) involves portfolio allocation decisions including the effects on the overall portfolio’s risk tolerance (aggregate portfolio beta, for example).
Getting out (which is where we're at currently) could be a technical analysis decision, but given the longer-term view that this is a sector to be avoided, the benefits achieved thanks to the rally from oversold levels would encourage me to begin lightening up, taking my short-term profits and bring the sector allocation level back down to its pre-rally underweight levels.
Loving what you hate is no fun, but for actively managed accounts playing a game of chicken can be a useful, if not necessary, option.
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
No positions in stocks mentioned.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides

















