Has the Public Already Turned Their Back on Banks? Jason Goepfert Jul 18, 2007 1:00 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|

When a theme becomes so ingrained in the minds of traders and investors that the vast majority of them act on that theme, it’s usually about the time that that very pattern is winding down.
There’s no doubt that the biggest news story out there now is the worry about financials and the potential time bombs sitting in various accounts just waiting to be marked to market. With the trillions in derivatives linked every which way, it’s easy to see how credit issues could sink the stock market boat, with financials at the helm.
I kind of doubt that we’ve seen the last of the issues related to the subprime morass, but something stood out to me as I was going through some of the indicators I follow... lots of folks have seemingly already given up on banks and brokers.
One of the guides I use to determine this comes from asset data gathered from the Rydex mutual fund family, and the ProShares stable of exchange-traded funds. By tracking asset flows among the various funds, we can sometimes get a pretty good idea about where “the public” is seeing opportunity – and risk.
The chart below shows assets in these funds over the past four years. I’ve highlighted the other times that assets in the Rydex Financial Services Fund has reached this low of a level – those times when apathy towards the sector appeared overwhelming. I’ll go over some stats after the chart that shows what’s happened in the past seven years when we’ve seen similarly low asset levels.

Click here to enlarge.
Since 2000, there have been 69 days when the fund has had its assets decline this much (encompassing what turns out to be really four distinct time periods – March 2000, March 2003, October 2005 and June 2006).
Looking at three-month returns going forward, it looks pretty good. For the Financial Select SPDR (XLF), the three month return was +10.1% with 67 out of the 69 days (97%) showing a positive return. On average, the most XLF went against us during that three months was a tolerable -2.6%. That seems especially acceptable since the average maximum gain during those same three months was +12.2%.
It follows that the components of banking/brokerage indexes did well, too.
- Citigroup (C) showed a three month return of +7.6% with 75% of the days positive.
- Bear Stearns (BSC) +6.5% with 75% positive.
- Lehman Brothers (LEH) +11.8% with 86% positive.
- Merrill Lynch (MER) 11.3% with 93% positive.
- Wells Fargo (WFC) +10.3% with 99% positive.
- US Bank (USB) +11.7% with 96% positive.
We never really know what’s brewing on the balance sheets of some of these institutions. But for some of the select “safer” banking and brokerage firms, any additional panic-type sympathy sell-off based on recent news headlines looks like it should be a better time to initiate or add to long positions as opposed to following the herd over the cliff.
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides

















