Homebuilders Win Senate Vote, Everyone Else Loses

Mike Mish Shedlock  Nov 05, 2009 1:40 pm

Homebuilders Win Senate Vote, Everyone Else Loses
 
Yet another stimulus plan that's a total waste of money.
 

 

The Senate approved yet another plan to stimulate the economy. It's called, throwing $33 billion at homebuilders. This is, of course, doing nothing but giving money to the greedy people that helped create this mess. But that's the way Washington works.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid even had the gall to brag about it. Please consider Senate Approves Extended US Homebuyer Tax Credit.
 

The US Senate approved a $45 billion plan to expand a tax credit for first-time homebuyers, extend jobless benefits and provide tax refunds to money-losing companies.


Lawmakers voted 98-0 for the measure, sending it to the House, where Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland said in a statement it will receive a vote as early as tomorrow. The bill then would be forwarded to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The plan would be the first major extension of provisions in February’s economic stimulus plan. The $8,000 homebuyers’ tax credit, slated to expire this month, would continue until April 30 and be expanded to include people with higher incomes and some who already own homes. That would cost about $10 billion in the fiscal year that began Oct. 1, according to Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation.

The measure includes $2.4 billion to extend unemployment benefits for as many as 20 weeks, enough to aid the jobless through the holiday season. It would loosen tax rules for homebuilders and other money-losing companies to let them claim an estimated $33 billion in tax refunds this year, according to Joint Committee on Taxation estimates.

“Republicans used every trick in the book to slow and stall and ensure we can’t do important work,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said today.

Other Stimulus Measures

Lawmakers are still considering whether to extend several other elements of the stimulus package, including subsidies to help the jobless buy health insurance and increased funds for food stamps. Obama has called for sending seniors $250 checks because they won’t get a cost-of-living increase next year in their Social Security checks.

Waste of Money

Senator Christopher Bond, a Missouri Republican, called the tax credit a waste of money, saying studies show that most of those claiming the break would have bought homes anyway.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said in a research note yesterday that the credit probably spurred 200,000 home sales that otherwise wouldn’t have occurred.

Extending the credit to people who own homes wouldn’t reduce the excess housing blamed for the slump because “every buyer taking advantage of the move-up credit would necessarily be a seller,” Goldman Sachs said. It said the plan may increase housing prices by 1percent because “sellers are likely to incorporate a fraction of the credit amount in their sale prices.”


Waste Of Money

Of course it's a waste of money. The most galling thing about it is $33 billion of the $45 billion is not going to do anything but pad the pockets of those who helped create this mess. A mere $2.4 billion was given to extend unemployment benefits.

If Goldman Sachs is correct (and I believe they are), then most of the $10 billion in tax credits is a waste as well. Moreover, we have a huge inventory of homes already and we're creating incentives to build more.

The whole thing reeks and the Senate knows it. Note that Senator Christopher Bond called it a waste of money but there wasn't a single "No Vote." The bill passed 98-0 undoubtedly because the homebuilders padded the pockets of those voting for it with campaign contributions. This is the way Congress "works."


48 of 56 (86%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (56 Votes)
Comments (13) See All Comments »
11-06-2009, 8:35 am
I generally agree with you.

The only problem I see that we have too many houses already. Since I rent by choice (well, not 100% by choice since the bubble hasn't fully collapsed in area), it's very frustrating to see money
Read More
11-06-2009, 10:02 am
It's all worth discussing. As a licensed Florida Real Estate Broker, my view is tilted. I had a front row seat to the loaning lunacy. We had banks and mortgage companies buying us meals daily telling of their no money down, over 100% financing
Read More
11-06-2009, 11:34 am
LOL on pale vs pail. I do that all the time.

I think the worst bit of it is that the credit has sucked up the absolute last bit of the demand for the next several years. Between my husband and I, we know of 4-6 examples of people buy
Read More
11-06-2009, 12:05 pm
They teach (real estate class) that the avg life of a house(single family) is about 60 years. Meaning without a rebuild (resetting the useful lifespan), a home is ready for the wrecking ball/bulldozer without having major (plumb, elec, structural)
Read More
11-06-2009, 12:38 pm
"Buy low sell high, works off Wall Street too albeit highly illiquid. "

The big question with that strategy is always "are we actually buying low"? It's not a trivial question.

12 years ago when
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »RIMM »AMZN »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert