Has the S&P Topped?

Sushil Kedia  May 06, 2009 11:00 am

Has the S&P Topped?
 
Is this just the illusion of an ongoing rally?
 

 
Below is the hourly bar chart of the S&P Index futures near contract. The pattern into new highs regularly ensconced inside a rising channel provides the illusion of a ongoing rally. Atop are various Demark readings on the daily chart that create a prospective top here today.


Click here to enlarge.


The chart is an Elliot Wave stab on the same. The big drop to 822 that came in a 5-wave pattern is the key to this chart. That drop was the wave c of a larger degree flat corrective, marked as the yellow X, after completing the inner Y at that point.

From this drop of 822, this market has risen in 3 distinct legs, with the first 2 being choppy overlapping A and B waves marked in blue letters. The latest rise from the 841 area to a now clear 5-wave pattern, where today is the day for completion of the fifth of these, and of which 1,2 & 3 are definitely done.

One more high after the initial hour drop at most is where this market will go to before going and breaking all the way under the 780 area, which is where this highly under-bought rise began. The coming drop isn't marked to time scales, due to inadequate space on one screen for so much fine data. Such a sequence of no more than 2 down closes after any interim highs since the March 31 low does characterize a market that continued to rise in an under-bought state.

Tops don't happen because of selling, but because of buying exhaustion. Such an under-bought market, which rises with such an intricate inner structure of wave counts, can
continue to defer the final reversal, but today seems the deferral is not likely further without a drop into at least 862. That being the last low of the wave 5 of this latest C.

So, if this market does drop to 862 from the 2nd hour high of today, we will have to again work at finding the wave structure of this first fall. Until then, play well with this volatile rise.
31 of 37 (84%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (37 Votes)
Comments (13) See All Comments »
05-07-2009, 9:32 am
Ya it would be strange that
1) the belly buttton is .618 down the human body.
2) that the heart contract to .618 of its full size
3) I'm sure all numbers are the same. That is the point of numbers, right?

Today
Read More
05-07-2009, 9:33 am
see above
Read More
05-07-2009, 10:03 am
Actually, your examples of the human heart contraction and the belly-button ratio relate to the exact topic of the essay, which is the mistaken analogy (in my view) that Elliott Wave theory draws between natural phenomena and stock index movements.
Read More
05-08-2009, 5:32 pm
but I still find the following statement terribly funny:

"The pattern into new highs regularly ensconced inside a rising channel provides the illusion of a ongoing rally."

I'd hate to see what a real rally
Read More
05-09-2009, 8:34 am
It's because these new highs are "ensconced" in the channel---therefore, your stock portfolio didn't really rise 35% in the last two months. Before something like that can really happen, the market technicians need to sit do
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert