Why Facebook Doesn't Like Sushi Porn Anymore

By Carol Kopp  APR 01, 2014 9:18 AM

For some marketers, Facebook's changes to its news feed add up to a real buzzkiller.

 


Gradually but inexorably, Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) has been changing the algorithm that determines which posts its users see and in what order.
 
The company says it is doing this to improve the quality of the main news feed that each of its billion users sees. Brands that rely on Facebook to boost clicks to their sites claim the changes were made to force them to pay for better visibility and boost Facebook's revenues.
 
Almost certainly, both are right.
 
The issue has been boiling below the surface for a while now, but it has suddenly made the news via -- what else -- a viral post.
 
Eat24, a food-delivery site, just posted a funny, sarcastic open letter to Facebook, announcing that it is pulling its Facebook page because the changes in the site's algorithm have buried the funny, sarcastic posts that helped it earn 70,000 followers.

 

Eat24's "breakup letter" reads, in part:
 
When we first met, you made us feel special. We'd tell you a super funny joke about Sriracha and you'd tell all our friends and then everyone would laugh together. But now? Now you want us to give you money if we want to talk to our friends. Now when we show you a photo of a taco wrapped with bacon, you're all like "PROMOTE THIS POST! GET MORE FRIENDS!" instead of just liking us for who we are. That's hella messed up.
 
The food site is indignant about the algorithm changes, and what they mean for its special kind of humor:
 
...your algorithm is saying most of our friends don't care about sushi porn, that they aren't interested in hearing our deepest thoughts about pizza toppings. Are you listening to yourself? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? You know that all those people clicked "Like" on our page because it's full of provocatively posed burritos and cheese puns, right?
 
No surprisingly, Eat24 has gotten more buzz from this posting than it ever got on Facebook, even for its sushi porn.
 
But a Facebook spokesperson soon posted an equally irreverent comment on the Eat24 story:

"There is some serious stuff happening in the world and one of my best friends just had a baby and another one just took the best photo of his homemade cupcakes and what we have come to realize is people care about those things more than sushi porn."
 As you can see, Facebook executives have as peculiar a definition of "important stuff" as Eat24 does. However, Facebook owns the algorithm here, and that's what counts.
 
Facebook says its intention is to improve the unique news feed that each user sees by prioritizing high-quality content. In the process, it is burying posts that are purely promotional, posts from so-called "content farms" that produce articles of dubious value, and posts that exploit the latest Internet memes.
 
It would be interesting to see Facebook's research on the subject. It may have reason to worry that its users are getting turned off by the sheer volume of junk posts -- even if the problem was caused by users' own casual "likes."
 
Inevitably, the process is both flawed and opaque, and the losers are up in arms. There's only one way around the system, and that is to pay to play. If you want your post to be seen, pay for a "promoted" post, Facebook advises its users.
 
In many if not most cases, it's easy to see Facebook's point. Major advertisers have been getting a free ride on the site for going on 10 years now.
 
Then again, so have many small start-ups with zero advertising budgets, and many worthy editorial operations that are not particularly profitable -- or won't be if their stories no longer get that all-important Facebook exposure.
 
For them, a tweak in the Facebook algorithm could be a buzzkiller of epic proportions.

Also see:

iPhone Apps (Still) Crash More Than Android Apps, Study Shows



No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.