(NYSE:UA) stock is now up to $81 from $59 this past July
, when I said that it was already overpriced. Momentum analysis is not my thing.
Interestingly, nothing much has changed. EPS estimates are not up significantly, if at all, and valuation is extremely stretched. Using sell side estimates of $1.64 and $2.00 for next 12 months and next two years, respectively, a 4.2% risk-free rate (Long T-bond plus .5%) and a 2% terminal growth rate, the stock discounts a 34% five-year growth rate if I assign a 7% risk discount. Consider that the sell-side consensus growth rate, which is almost always too high, is 21%, implying a $46 stock.
Even bending over backwards to justify the stock price with a 6.5% risk discount, the stock price implies 32% growth.
One thing I did not mention in my July note on Under Armour is that their customers are heavily in the 12-year-old to 24-year-old range. And of course, there is the problem of college grad unemployment, high college costs, and the coming college debt crises, all of which will weigh on UA’s sales growth over the next five years. So as it happens, I was cruising Natick Mall in Natick
, Massachusetts, just west of Boston, this weekend and went into a new Under Armour store, one of four prototypes opened in the US recently, or so a sales person told me.
The store was a real downer for a UA bull, in my opinion. It was merchandised for a teen and preteen audience with lots of merchandise featuring images of Superman and some other preteen and teen motifs. It was as if UA management sees the slightly older college and young adult market as financially challenged, as I do, and decided to direct its efforts toward the moms and dads of the slightly younger demographic.
One market that Under Armour might target in a search for higher margins is Lululemon’s
(NASDAQ:LULU) largely female consumer base. On the aforementioned weekend shopping trip, I wandered into Gap Inc.’s
(NYSE:GPS) Athleta store right after a visit to Lululemon. I did not have the time to do any price comparisons, but I do know that Athleta’s prices are lower, probably noticeably so, and Gap’s products will probably be good quality. My guess is that the margins in Lulu’s apparel will be coming down significantly, and UA’s sales in this segment will not be profitable enough to support an over 30% five- year EPS growth rate.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.