Solar Cell Efficiency Sets a New Record at 44.7%

By Benzinga.com  SEP 26, 2013 11:25 AM

Some claim that this will allow for cheaper solar energy, but others say that the technology is too expensive to be commercially viable.

 


Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by James Ha.

The solar market is difficult to read because it relies on quickly changing technology while being heavily tangled in politics and other sectors of the economy, such as the volatile price of fossil fuels. In addition, the wide range of solar technologies from quantum dots to nano-crystals make it difficult to track clear progress.

Despite its popularity, solar energy has come under fire from critics who cite expensive kilowatt per hour (kWh) costs compared to other energy sources. The EIA states that in 2017, solar energy will be 55.3% more expensive than coal, 63.2% more expensive than nuclear, and 73.9% more expensive than wind.

Solar companies continue to make grand claims of groundbreaking advancement, which would allow solar energy to be economically viable for an average consumer in near future. However, there is skepticism in the marketplace because leading solar advocates seem to dodge any binding quotes.

This Monday, German Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Soitec (EPA:SOI), CEA-Leti, and the Helmholtz Center Berlin announced the development of a 44.7% efficiency solar cell. While some claim that the new record will allow for cheaper solar energy, others state that III-IV based multijunction cells used for this record are expensive to produce and do not hold much commercial value.

While there has been no promise of cost efficient energy application from this new record, Soitec's Chairman and CEO, André-Jacques Auberton-Hervé, conveys that the quickening rate of development in the solar technology may allow solar energy to outcompete other energy sources earlier than expected.

"This world record increasing our efficiency level by more than one point in less than four months demonstrates the extreme potential of our four-junction solar cell design, which relies on Soitec bonding techniques and expertise,” he announced in a press release this Monday. “It confirms the acceleration of the roadmap toward higher efficiencies which represents a key contributor to competitiveness of our own CPV systems. We are very proud of this achievement, a demonstration of a very successful collaboration."

US solar consumption has jumped by 55% since 1995 and appears in a multitude of commercial merchandises ranging from phone chargers to parking meters. In addition, big name companies have started to use solar as an energy source in their stores. According to the Solar Energy Industries AssociationWal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) and Walgreens (NYSE:WAG) lead the way with 144 and 134 stores using the energy source respectively. Other leaders include Kohl's (NYSE:KSS), Costco (NASDAQ:COST), and Macy's (NYSE:M).

Is solar energy the new hope for humanity or is it the second coming of corn ethanol, propelled by green energy zealots and angst about the rising price of fossil fuels?

Most experts agree that solar power will soon become a reliable and economically sensible energy source across the private and public sectors.

Assuming that those analysts are right, a multitude of companies will enter and fade from the industry as the solar market takes form. Forbes reports that 40 solar companies went out of business in 2012 with several others declaring bankruptcy. Despite these failures, investors have huge expectations for solar, with these companies trading at huge multiples.

The Guggenheim Solar ETF (NYSEARCA:TAN), which tracks the performance of 25 solar companies, is up more than 97% this year.

Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:

Should Bill Gates Just Go Ahead and Hang It Up?

The Apple Stories You Missed Wednesday

Dividend ETFs for a No-Tapering World

Twitter: @Benzinga


Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.