On October 10, 2008, with the S&P 500
(INDEXSP:.INX) at 839.80, the bottoming process began when 92.6% of all stocks traded on the NYSE made new annual lows. That’s a six standard deviation event, which is supposed to occur only twice in a lifetime. At the time, many investors were liquidating their portfolios because they did not heed Benjamin Graham’s advice in his epic book The Intelligent Investor
: "The essence of investment management is the management of risks
, not the management of returns
. Well-managed portfolios start with this precept."
Consequently, investors who failed to respect the Dow Theory "sell signal" of November 2007 ended up incurring substantial losses into the beginning of the October 2008 bottoming process. Moreover, they continued to liquidate their portfolios right into the S&P 500’s ultimate intraday bottom of 666.79 on Friday, March 6, 2009. Surprisingly, I was on Bloomberg TV that Monday (March 2, 2009), stating, "The bottoming process that began last October is complete this week and we are ‘all in.'” I have been pretty constructive on equities ever since.
I did, however, recommend raising cash in the spring of 2010, 2011, and 2012, on a tactical trading basis, with the strategy of putting that cash back to work during the summer months; that is all you had to get right in those years to produce decent equity returns. This year, my mantra has been that "sell in May and go away" is not going to work as I targeted the mid-July through mid-August timeframe as the first window for a meaningful decline to begin. To be precise, it was the timing/quantitative models (not me) that gave the exact date of July 19, 2013 for the stock market’s internal energy to be totally exhausted. Yet I have been the one taking the heat for that "call" because the SPX made a few marginal closing highs above the July 19 high of 1692.
Nevertheless, the fact of the matter is that the stock market’s internal energy was indeed used up in mid-July with the various averages virtually going sideways and then pulling back 4.1% over the past three weeks (intraday high to intraday low). Interestingly, this recent pullback is remarkably similar to the May 22 to June 6 decline of this year (see chart below). That initial decline was roughly 5% and left the NYSE McClellan Oscillator extremely oversold. The SPX subsequently rallied 3.5% into its June 18 peak before resuming the decline into its June 24 low. The entire pullback encompassed 7.5%. If that chart pattern repeats this time, it would suggest that the rally attempt that began last Thursday should peak between 1684 and 1696. Personally, I don’t think that the SPX has the energy to make it back through my 1684 "pivot point." On the downside, I still think the SPX has an appointment into the 1530 (April low) to 1560 (June low) zone.
Click to enlarge
Of course, I continue to think such pullbacks are within the context of a bull market since my confidence remains high that we are in a new secular bull market. Last week, I carried that message to Nashville where I spoke with institutional accounts and presented at events for my firm's financial advisors and their clients. Regrettably, most of them think you need a "feel good" environment for a bull market to exist. But when you get that "feel good" environment, it tends to be late in the game. Ladies and gentlemen, the equity markets do not care about the absolutes of good and bad; they only care about whether things are getting better or worse. And things are definitely getting better! To emphasize that point, in my presentations, I always discussed the American Industrial Renaissance (onshoring) whereby manufacturing jobs are coming back to America. To wit, chemical companies are expanding into the US because of our low natural gas prices. Airbus just broke ground for a massive new plant in Mobile, Alabama; VW is expanding its facility in Tennessee; Samsung
(OTCMKTS:SSNLF) is spending $4 billion in Austin, Texas; Michelin is investing $750 million in South Carolina; Denso
(OTCMKTS:DNZOY) is spending $750 million in five different states; and the list goes on.
Next is the energy independence theme, with the US becoming the largest natural gas producer in the world in 2015 and likely going to be energy independent in the 2020 - 2025 timeframe. Yet most importantly, I think the 2010 midterm election marked a turning point in the political arena whereby over the next five years, we are going to elect smarter policymakers and therefore get smarter policies. Unsurprisingly, for that view I have been termed naive. In my presentations, I talk about numerous reasons for that belief. Unfortunately, there is not enough space in this missive to go into much detail on this theme. I will, however, offer some quips from last Thursday’s Wall Street Journal
article titled "A New Law to Liberate American Business" by Thomas G. Stemberg, founder of Staples Inc.
(NASDAQ:SPLS), as an example of "smarter policies." The author begins by noting:
There are so many government impediments to business today that the next Staples — and its 50,000 jobs — might never get off the ground. Chief among those roadblocks: the blizzard of bureaucratic red tape that buries businesses and stifles job creation. These include the additional 16 million hours that vending machine and chain restaurant business owners must spend complying with new food regulations each year. But there is also the license that magicians require to do a rabbit disappearing act, which mandates an annual fee, surprise inspections, and a rabbit disaster plan. All told, American business faces 46,758 pages of rules to live by in the Federal Register.... [Job] creators know that regulatory relief can't come soon enough. In 2010, the Small Business Administration pegged the annual cost of complying with regulations at $1.75 trillion. The SBA report covered 2008 and the burden has certainly grown since. A May 2013 report by the Heritage Foundation, "Red Tape Rising," found that new regulatory costs added in 2012 totaled $23.5 billion.
Wow, no wonder job creation has been slow to recover. But help may be on the way because of Senators Angus King and Roy Blunt. Their bill, "The Regulator Improvement Act of 2010," would create a bipartisan Regulatory Improvement Commission whose purpose is to recommend cuts in the regulatory regime. Those recommended cuts would require a mandatory up-or-down, nonamendable, vote by Congress. The King-Blunt concept has already worked as seen with “The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission” (BRAC), which has been responsible for the closure of 121 major military bases since 1988.
As the Wall Street Journal
In short, the BRAC Commission gave politicians what they crave most: cover. Nobody back home could blame them for losing a military base. The King-Blunt proposal will give representatives the same cover with regulations. The bipartisan Regulatory Improvement Commission – with members appointed by the president and congressional leaders – would tackle one area of regulation at a time. Its members would be charged with finding regulations that are duplicative, like the 642 million hours employees will spend complying with redundant regulations this year, according to the American Action network. The panel also will try to identify obsolete regulations, maybe resembling the arcane rules the Federal Communications Commission leverages to achieve whatever regulatory aims the commissioners desire.
I happen to believe that all of this is pretty bullish over the longer term. But in the near term, I remain cautious for all of the stated reasons.
The call for this week
: The initial leg down from the May 22 peak ended on June 6, which left the McClellan Oscillator very oversold (see chart below), and was followed by an ensuing 3.5% rally into the July 2 top of 709.67. Subsequently, the secondary decline began on June 16 and ended on June 24, taking another 94 points off of the SPX. The current chart pattern looks very similar to that of the May 22 to June 6 drop, and if that pattern repeats, it suggests the current rally attempt should peter out in the 1684 to 1696 zone, followed by a secondary decline that carries the SPX into the prescribed 1530 - 1560 zone where a trading bottom should be anticipated.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.