Bulls in Trouble?

By Jason Haver  AUG 27, 2013 10:00 AM

A new low would go a long way toward confirming an intermediate trend change.

 


Well, given the shape of the rally and yesterday's subsequent downside price overlap of some key levels, I think it's fairly safe to say that the bears still have control of the market. And that they're likely to retain control at intermediate degree for the foreseeable future.

The S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) was unable to do more than peek above its layered resistance zone, and that head-fake breakout immediately whipsawed -- and more significantly, then went on to overlap 1656, which was a key bull level. The rally counts as a complete ABC, and suggests new lows on deck for the near term. (Note there is a fairly obvious typo on the chart below -- but for anyone who's bad at math, the lower annotation should read "1656," not "1556.")


Click to enlarge

I suspect that the S&P 500 will ultimately break my preliminary target of the low 1600s and head into the 1500s -- the biggest question in my mind is how we get there. I'm inclined to believe that the rally was a second wave, but it's technically possible that it could have been wave (4) of the current leg. I'll cover this in a bit more detail in a moment.


Click to enlarge

Before I get into the complicated hair-splitting technicalities, let me make a couple simple statements to keep confusion from popping up among readers. I expect that near term, we're going to make new lows. I expect that intermediate term, the trend change we were anticipating is in the early stages, and the trend is now down. So I'm bearish, both near term and intermediate term.

The more subtle technicality is whether the rally we just experienced was wave (4) of the first leg down, or was instead the totality of the larger wave ii (much more immediately bearish). I'm giving a slight edge to the idea that it was wave ii, but I'll present the counter-argument below, using the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX:.DJI) as an example. The Dow probably counts better as a fourth wave. Note this picture is still quite bearish; it's simply a question of whether the bottom falls out immediately or not.


Click to enlarge

The Russell 2000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUT) (or RUT -- remember around the turn of the millennium when seemingly everything was named "2000"? No relation to RUT) suggests that the rally was a second wave, due to the price overlap at 1042. This chart paints a pretty bearish picture.


Click to enlarge

The Philadelphia Bank Index (INDEXDJX:BKX) was completely unable to clear its pivot zone. This chart notes the alternate, more bullish count. I'm heavily discounting the bull option at the moment, but a breakout over 65 would suggest I'm wrong, and that the bulls have solid potential.


Click to enlarge

In conclusion, a new low would be as close as the market ever comes to "confirming" anything, and should confirm a trend change at intermediate degree. I expect we'll make that new low, and I therefore expect we are indeed in a bearish trend at intermediate degree. As I see it, the best hope for bulls at the moment is for the next low to be the fifth wave of this first leg down, and thus give them a good bounce to sell in to. But either way, unless the bulls can pull a miraculous stick save and prevent a new low here, I believe SPX will see the 1500s (and possibly much, much lower) before it sees the 1700s again.  Trade safe.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.