You can always be certain that we are living in uncertain times, which is why the old Wall Street adage about markets not liking uncertainty is so devoid of content. It was not even four months ago
that I could analyze which industry groups’ behavior diverged the most and least from the broad market’s behavior as a function of excess global liquidity.
Now the question has to be which industry groups have been hurt the most and the least by the sudden rise in long-term interest rates. As an aside, this shift and the concomitant bearish steepening of the yield curve were visible back in January
; had it not been for developments such as the bungled Cypriot bailout in March -- remember that? -- and Japan’s expansion of QE in April, we would have been at our present bond sell-off earlier.
Hurt by Higher Yields
Let’s compare return streams for 144 industry groups in the S&P 1500 Supercomposite across two periods. The first period will be from the November 14, 2012 downside breakout in the yen and the beginning of our own post-election rally through May 2, 2013. The second period will extend from the first upside breakout in ten-year Treasury yields through the release of the FOMC June minutes last week.
A total of 21 groups’ returns changed at a 90%+ confidence interval; all of these changes were from higher returns to lower returns. The list is dominated by REITs, utilities, and a host of consumer staples, such as personal products, tobacco, and soft drink companies; unsurprisingly, the homebuilders are on this list, too. If these groups sound like a who’s who of winners from the November 2012 - April 2013 period, a time when supposedly defensive issues were leading the market, it is because they are. The REITs include some well-recognized names like Simon Property Group
(NYSE:PLD), Plum Creek Timber
(NYSE:PCL), Public Storage
(NYSE:WY), and American Tower
(NYSE:AMT). The consumer staples list is populated by firms such as Altria
(NYSE:KO), and Avon Products
Unfazed by Higher Yields
A total of 14 groups’ returns were unchanged at a 90%+ confidence level. Unlike the list above, these have no strong connecting theme. In only two of the cases -- household appliances and leisure facilities -- did returns decrease after May 2, 2013 from the November 2012 - May 2013 period. These two groups include firms such as International Speedway
(NASDAQ:ISCA), Life Time Fitness
(NYSE:LTM), and Whirlpool
(NYSE:WHR). I guess if you're determined to shoulder press a refrigerator while running around a racetrack, higher Treasury yields are not going to stop you.
The pattern from earlier in the year -- having supposedly defensive stocks leading the way higher as investors chased yield -- was not sustainable; at some point, dividend yields had to approach an arbitrage bound with both corporate and government bonds. Growth, or the embedded call option on earnings, is a much more sustainable path to higher equity returns.
As firms availed themselves of the opportunity to issue debt during the period of artificially low rates, and as corporate balance sheets still show a large amount of cash, higher yields will be less damaging to corporate profitability than they might have been at an earlier time. The real question is whether governments will be able to function with their high debt loads after a decade of incontinent spending habits once the Federal Reserve stops monetizing their debts.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.