Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by Tim Parker.
(NASDAQ:AAPL) keeps its lawyers busy with its constant stream of patent lawsuits, but a new case was filed late last week that is just now making news.
This time it’s not a rival company, patent troll, or one of the many frivolous suits that the company is hit with. This time, it’s from Apple’s own employees.
The case is Amanda Frlekin and Dean Pelle v. Apple, Inc.
The plaintiffs are former Apple retail employees who claim that they lost around $1,400 in wages per year because of Apple’s security policies.
The complaint alleges, “Apple has engaged and continues to engage in illegal and improper wage practices that have deprived Apple hourly employees throughout the United States of millions of dollars in wages and overtime compensation."
When an Apple employee completes a shift or clocks out for a meal break, the employee’s bags and pockets are checked. According to the complaint, the employee has to wait an average of 10-15 minutes before the security check is performed.
At issue is the fact that employees aren’t paid for the time they wait for the check. This can add up to 50 minutes to 1.5 hours per week for a total of around $1,400 per year.
The plaintiffs are seeking to make this a class action suit that represents all current and former Apple retail employees over the past three years.
A security check of this type isn’t necessarily out of line, AppleInsider
points out. Electronics retailers and other companies dealing in high-dollar merchandise often have security checks of employees, but companies like GameStop
(NYSE:GME) allow employees to stay on the clock until the check is complete.
This isn’t the first time that Apple has come under fire for its treatment of its retail employees. A story last year by the New York Times
found that employees were paid between $9 and $15 per hour—in-line with other retail employees but lower than employees in other, less profitable stores.
The class action suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs are seeking a jury trial.
Disclosure: At the time of this writing, Tim Parker was long Apple.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
The Top 10 Financial Tweets For Tuesday, July 30
Amazon Gets President's Attention with its Massive Employment Campaign
BlackBerry's U.S. Market Share Drops to 1% as Apple Soars
Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.