(NASDAQ:PNRA) reported second-quarter earnings per share of $1.74, up 16%. That was around $.04 below analysts’ estimates. Sales were the only real issue in the company's earnings results.
Same-store sales were up 3.7% when 4.4% was the expectation. There was a 4.3% increase in price/mix combined with a .5% drop in traffic. Comparable store sales are running up 2.1% in the third quarter so far. Management said that breakfast sales were under some pressure, and that sales would be higher at lunch, if customers could get served faster. To that end, they would add staff at lunch. Also, increased complexity and a higher number of entrees per order have apparently slowed service.
So management said that it would add some lower priced options that will initially include half-sandwiches coming this year. Smaller and lower costing fare will be on tap next year. Management believes that third-quarter same-store sales growth will be in the 2-4% range. Full-year earnings guidance has been reduced 2%.
Breakfast is a very price-sensitive meal, I believe, and it is one of the first places that excessively high prices would show up. If there are too many different menu offerings now, which is evident during lunch at Panera, how can management add new lower priced menu offerings without a disproportionately negative effect on profitability? My prior observation
that main menu items are about $.75 overpriced is being proven correct.
Basically, I see management as being in denial about its prices being too high and figuring that it is smart enough to work its way around it, rather than directly cut menu prices to where they should be. It is similar to the situation as Darden Restaurants
(NYSE:DRI) has been in, and with Olive Garden, especially. Wrestling with that problem will create other problems that will slow down the long-term growth rate of sales and EPS.
For the remainder of 2013, the sales and earning guidance is probably too high, creating just the right environment for more disappointments to bring the stock down to the $145-155 area. I have not done any research to see what a complete rebasing of prices to competitive levels would do, but I am sure that it would not be pretty.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.