Gold cannot be printed or manufactured in contrast to paper currency. That’s why it has kept its value as the ultimate currency over the long term. There can be no “gold war.” However, we often hear about a "currency war." Sounds familiar -- where did we hear this before?
The phrase “currency war” was coined by Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega after the financial crisis of 2008. The idea is that highly indebted nations weaken the value of their currency by cutting interest rates down to zero and printing fiat currency in order to gain trade advantages (cheaper products to export) and to pay less debt service on their bonds. Countries compete against each other to achieve a relatively low exchange rate for their own currency. The policy can trigger retaliatory action by other countries that in turn can lead to a general decline in international trade, harming all countries.
Concerns over a currency war prompted the Group of Seven and Group of 20 economies recently to formulize what constitutes appropriate behavior by central banks in influencing currency exchange rates.
Let’s look at some numbers. Global currency reserves have swelled from $1.9 trillion in the year 2000 to a whopping $11.2 trillion by the third quarter of 2012. But most of that gain took place during the past six years with global currency reserves doubling to the current levels from $5.6 trillion at the beginning of 2007. If that is not evidence of the global currency war, then what is? There are two different examples to consider. The first is undeniable evidence of aggressive money printing. The second is an indication of determined stockpiling of the currencies of other countries in order to weaken your own currency.
For a widespread currency war
to occur, a large proportion of significant economies must wish to devalue their currencies at once. This has so far only happened during a global economic downturn.
Under normal economic conditions, countries tend to overlook a small rise in the value of their own currency. However, during a time of recession, nations can take umbrage at other countries’ devaluations.
Let’s begin this week's technical part with the analysis of the US dollar's long-term chart. (Charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com
When we take a look at the above chart, we can see that the USD Index declined once again this week. Despite that fact, the January breakout was not invalidated. As we see, the index is still above the declining support line, and thus the medium-term outlook remains bullish.
Let’s take a look at the medium-term situation. Has it changed since last week?
Here we can see that the USD Index moved to its medium-term support line (marked with the thin black line), which is currently close to 80.4. It is very possible that this line will pause the decline, at least for a while, and it’s quite possible that it will actually stop it.
The situation remains bullish for the USD Index in the long term and medium term, so let’s check to see if the short-time outlook is the same.
During the last several days, the USD Index declined and moved slightly below the short-term support line. There is a medium-term support line visible on the previous chart that is much more important so the above is actually not a big deal.
The most important factor on the above chart supporting the bullish case is the cyclical turning point, which is very close – about a week away. It is possible that we will see its impact on the dollar next week and this can lead to a bigger pullback or – more likely – the end of the current decline. If we move back in time a bit, we will see similar situation in August and September 2012, which is when the cyclical turning point worked very well after a significant decline.
Additionally, please note that the RSI Indicator is now at the 30 level, which is a classic buying opportunity.
Let's find out what impact has this decline had on the two most popular precious metals.
Click to enlarge
In this week’s very long-term gold chart, comments I made last week
The outlook continues to be bearish and the trend remains down. Gold could still decline heavily based on the long-term cyclical turning point…. In both 2008 and 2009, local tops formed slightly after the cyclical turning point, so it is possible that the reversal in the downtrend won’t be seen until after the cyclical turning point once again, leaving a number of days in which further declines could be seen.
We are still likely to see declines after the cyclical turning point from this long-term perspective. The turning point should work on a “near to” basis, and declines will likely be seen sooner rather than later (and the bottom is likely weeks away, not months away).
Now let’s take a look at the white metal.
Click to enlarge
In this week’s very long-term silver chart, not much really happened as prices declined slightly, less than half of 1% overall. The intraday high for the week was lower than last week once again; from this perspective, the declines clearly go on.
No confirmed move has been seen below the level of the 2008 highs, but silver’s price is only slightly above it at this time. It seems that we’ll have another sharp decline once the breakdown below this support level is seen and confirmed.
Summing up, the most important event in the currency market was the further decline of the dollar. Although the decline visible on the USD Index chart has been quite heavy, we have not seen a rally in gold and silver so far this week; they moved lower. Gold’s underperformance has become even more significant this week and I think that this makes the outlook even more bearish for the short term. Although recent declines in silver have been small, the downtrend remains in place. The implications of the aforementioned underperformance are bearish for the precious metals sector.
For the full version of this essay and more, visit Sunshine Profits' website.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.