There are two aspects of human existence where the correct answer is supposed to be “It doesn’t matter.” As absolutely nobody believes the second, let’s focus on the first, and that is whether past performance can be used to predict future results.
If the answer was an absolute “No,” we could -- and indeed should -- abandon all forms of technical analysis, managerial performance analysis, and the ocean of statistical minutiae supporting industries ranging from Big Data marketing to fantasy football. But while every study of investment management has shown that chasing last year’s winning trades and last year’s hot managers is not a good idea, this does not mean the forces of mean reversion will rescue every bad idea.
Japanese Policy: Repeat Regardless of Results
Blue Oyster Cult understood the concept perfectly in their 1977 camp classic "Godzilla"
History shows again and again
How nature points out the folly of men.
And yet policymakers in Tokyo, the large angry lizard’s stomping grounds, have undertaken a policy to break deflationary forces in Japan via two channels: massive expansion of the monetary base and a deliberate devaluation of the yen. Neither mechanism will work going forward for a very straightforward reason: They have not worked in the past.
Japan’s general consumer price index has been incredibly constant since 1991 regardless of the yen’s ups or downs. It has ranged from 98.2 to 104.5 since October 1991, and it has increased at an average annual rate of -0.028%. The US CPI, in contrast, has increased at an average annual rate of 2.423%. The yen’s long rally between 1971 and 1995 did little to arrest a rising CPI in Japan; then an average annual gain in the yen of 4.84% was matched by an average annual CPI increase of 5.12%.
Japan was part and parcel of the global inflation of the 1970s, and its rising yen was part of its leading role in global trade at that time. No one suggested then that what Japan needed to break inflation was an even more rapidly appreciating yen.
What about Japan’s plan to expand its money supply by expanding the monetary base? Here again I defer to the data: The rate of M2 growth in Japan after 1991 peaked at 4.9% in February 1998. Year-over-year changes in the monetary base, which includes cash plus current account balances at the Bank of Japan, has ranged from 30.9% in April 2002 to -25.1% in November 2006.
The fractional reserve banking mechanism for converting the monetary base into credit is even more broken in Japan than it is in the US or the eurozone. All of the Bank of Japan’s lurching back and forth may have given it the sensation of control, but it had little effect on the rate of change in the money supply.
Given the track record of global central banks in arresting the inflation of the 1970s, we should be grateful that they have been unable to create higher levels of inflation. Here is one area where past incompetence probably predicts future incompetence. Why a group of institutions who failed collectively at arresting deflation, at foreseeing and preventing asset bubbles and their bursting, and at providing macroeconomic stimulus via money printing should be trusted to arrest any inflation they may yet ignite is beyond me.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.