US Stocks: Over-Leveraged Markets at Risk of Global Margin Call

By Scott Martin, Macro Trading Consultants  APR 18, 2013 2:12 PM

The shift to a bear market is just a matter of time. The Fed would have zero control over a global margin call, a real risk that would lead to markets divorcing from QE.

 


This white paper addresses the extreme opacity of the current macro backdrop caused by monetary and fiscal policy, and how it obscures market sentiment and traditional measures of valuation. It is necessary to look at the real economy beyond monetary policy, and at my firm we propose that the cleanest and simplest of market measures are likely the most effective given the complexity of the underlying macro conditions. Such measures include structural fundamentals of the market, the current inter-market relationship between equity and debt markets, and technicals. By comparing these findings to historical precedents, our conclusion is that there is an impending bear market in US equities.

(Also read If an iPhone Can Be a Cash Register, What Can Google Glass Be?

Flawed Market Sentiment
The Federal Reserve Bank has been printing one way or another since 2008. The generally accepted Wall Street view is that the United States has turned into Japan through its own Quantitative Easing (QE) programs and therefore equities are “safe” from a bear market as this Fed-controlled game will go on forever (QE Infinity). We believe this corollary is wrong when compared with historical precedents.
Valuation: Impossible to Properly Measure
While market sentiment and valuation are separate constructs, they are both affected by the Fed’s monetary policy. Continuing to use traditional Wall Street axioms on valuation without considering the current environment is inane. It is impossible to see clearly by looking at the S&P (INDEXSP:.INX) through the lens of Price to Earnings without factoring in the Fed buying of $85 billion a month in debt. We are not saying that stocks are expensive or cheap. Rather, we are saying that traditional valuation analysis has been rendered impossible by the Fed.

Furthermore, we believe the ferocious buying back of shares by companies from issuing cheap debt is the true low valuation story. However, it is a story that is anchored on a historically unprecedented and unsustainable catalyst of Fed bond market manipulation.

(Also read The Roller Coaster Continues: What to Watch for in Financial Markets

The Real Economy: Housing and Payroll Tax
Housing is in the same camp as valuation. If the Fed wasn’t buying $85 billion a month in debt, where would rates, and thus the structured credit markets, and thus housing, be? The answer is nobody knows. This opacity is not bullish, contrary to every loud economist and pundit talking on TV.

The payroll tax of 2% will put consumers into a recession this year. The consumer continues to be highly levered while wages have been falling. We feel very confident that the street is working off of a higher base number for consumer discretionary budgets than is truly the case in reality. Therefore, the 2% that comes off the top is a much more impactful amount to the consumer than the street realizes.

Market Structure Fundamentals
In this muddled macro environment, it's important to study the underlying structure of the market to determine vulnerabilities. While volatility has been low, we believe that this is the product of the Fed’s policy of intentionally compressing volatility by commandeering interest rates and therefore commandeering control of equity market prices to the upside.
Debt: Connection with Equity Markets and Divergence from Issuance
It is also important to look at the market structure issues within the debt markets. Corporate issuance had its busiest January ever with $412.3 billion vs. the all-time high January issuance of $407.2 billion in January of 2009. The obvious difference is the massive narrowing of spreads from historically wide levels in 2009 to all-time lows today. We believe the Fed’s QE programs have turned equity markets into expressions of “bond yield complacency” and therefore the two markets are inextricably linked. This link manifests itself in the capital market phenomenon of Profit and Loss (PnL). For any market participant, whether institutional like a pension or hedge fund, or an individual, it’s the loss of principal that causes aggressive net selling.

The real risk here is the global margin call that can occur from simply too much long leverage chasing artificially low yields. The bloat in the system on the long side in bonds is now associated with long bloat on the equity side. Margin calls and selling in junk bonds and down bond funds will bleed over into equity funds and vice versa. The Fed would have zero control over a global PnL margin call on bond principal scenario. 

Despite the highest corporate issuance of all time in January of 2013, global bond markets had their first selloff in 14 months. Even in a month with issuance buoyed off the FED’s $85 billion a month buying program to artificially suppress rates, the fact that corporate bonds could go lower in price proves that markets can’t be controlled by the FED forever.

We believe equities are further away on the risk curve and therefore more susceptible to true market forces over time. Equities and higher yielding debt such as long dated treasuries, high yield and corporate high grades CAN diverge from each other, contrary to current market perception. We believe this dangerous long leverage is not present in certain bond markets such as shorter duration treasuries. Technicals:
Technicals represent the market forces that, over time, will no longer be under the FED’s control. The transports have made parabolic moves on the weekly and daily charts. Bull markets don’t start with old economy indexes such as the transports going parabolic to all time new highs. Instead, that’s how they end.

The Nasdaq-100 tracking ETF (Powereshares QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)) has formed the start of major Head and Shoulders (H&S) pattern on a weekly chart (See Appendix). iShares iBoxx $ High Yid Corp Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:HYG), SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:JNK), and iShares IBoxx $ Invest Grade Corp Bond Fund (NYSEARCA:LQD), all of which are ETFs that track junk debt and corporate debt, have also been forming H&S on daily charts (See Appendix). These patterns are extremely bearish. We do not view H&S patterns, if confirmed, to be associated with merely “corrections.” We would view the selloff with the current incredibly low short interest environment to be much more severe.

(Also read 10 Finance Books All Investors Should Read

A Matter of Time
History invariably repeats through each market cycle, even if expressed in different ways as society evolves. This bull market will end, like all bull markets eventually do. By looking at the cleanest and simplest of market measures, we’ve found vulnerabilities and a foreshadowing of a bear market. The dearth of short interest and extreme long leverage in both stocks and bonds is not only scary, but was exacerbated by the Fed’s policies.

The notion that stocks must sell off because of any of the things we have mentioned from a macro perspective is a matter of time, not a matter of timing. Like all bull market endings, it’s impossible to time on a macro level. This one is even harder to time due to the Fed’s artificial manipulation. However, the technical signals now in the market, along with the small but obvious divergence of bond prices and bond issuance, works as a whole as a timing mechanism for US equities entering a bear market. History says watch your charts first; connect the future obvious macro catalyst second.

Appendix:
The Head and Shoulders pattern is one of the most reliable and powerful trend-reversal patterns in technical analysis. The drawn neckline of the pattern represents an important support level, and the H&S pattern is confirmed when the neckline is broken.
 
QQQ Weekly (Aug ’07 – Present)


Click to enlarge
 
HYG Daily (Apr ’11 – Present)
 

Click to enlarge

About the author:

Scott Martin founded Macro Trading Consultants (MTC), a macroeconomic and quantitative investment strategy & consulting firm, in 2008, and continues to serve as CEO and Chief Strategist. After graduating from the University at Albany SUNY in 2000, he went through the trading desk training program and was a junior trader at Goldman Sachs. Subsequent to leaving Goldman, Scott was head trader at various hedge funds and broker dealers including the Abernathy Group, Diamondback Capital, and Keel Capital, before establishing MTC.

Henry Wong, Director of Research & Development and Managing Editor at MTC, also contributed to this story. Wong is a Bayesian statistician and received his master’s degree in Statistics from Harvard University after graduating from Tufts University with a triple major in Math, Quantitative Economics, and Psychology. Prior to joining MTC, Henry worked as a proprietary equities trader and China-focused quantitative analyst.

See also:

The Roller Coaster Continues: What to Watch for in Financial Markets

Who Isn't Producing Original Content These Days? Redbox Instant and Microsoft Latest to Enter Fray

Is Gold's Long-Term Story Still Intact?

Twitter: @Minyanville

No positions in stocks mentioned.