I hate showering unadulterated praise upon any company,
(NASDAQ:FB) has gone from zero to hero in mobile in a pretty short period of time.
Back in early 2012, Facebook’s Apple
(NASDAQ:AAPL) iOS and Google
(NASDAQ:GOOG) Android apps were slow and clunky, and frankly, quite painful to use.
And in fact, the company’s IPO flopped because too much of its traffic was coming from the mobile side, where it didn’t make much money. (See: Facebook's Q1 Results Indicate Further Deterioration in Growth and Monetization Metrics
But look how quickly things turned around.
In August 2012, Facebook launched a spectacularly improved iOS app, and followed that up with an Android equivalent in December 2012.
The improved apps, combined with a more aggressive mobile ad push, resulted in Facebook taking in $305 million in mobile ad revenue -- 23% of total revenue -- in the fourth quarter of 2012.
And now, Facebook is taking its mobile efforts to the next level with its Home initiative, which is rather unique in that it carries zero risk and has huge upside potential.
The heart of it all is the well-reviewed Home app for Android, which basically transforms several popular Android smartphones into Facebook-centric devices. For example, while a Home-equipped phone is locked, it displays Facebook updates, which is a great way to induce people into spending more time on Facebook.
And secondly, Facebook collaborated with HTC
(TPE:2498) to produce the HTC First, which, courtesy of its pre-loaded Home app, is effectively a Facebook phone.
Now, there is a small but vocal group of techies criticizing the idea of a Facebook-centric smartphone experience, but they’re missing the point. Let's remember a few things.
First, the serious tech enthusiasts that populate the blogosphere are not the target audience -- the general public is. And Facebook is now a part of the general public's daily lives. For now, it ain't going anywhere.
And from a financial standpoint, these initiatives can fail, and Facebook won’t be hurt one bit. In the worst case scenario, there will be some lost sunken costs that went into developing the Home Initiative.
No big whoop -- people will still use Facebook on desktops or via standard mobile apps.
However, if the Home concept can further entrench Facebook into users’ everyday lives, then it’s an absolute home run for the company.
Facebook Home will display updates even while a phone is locked.
And there's another twist of which you should be aware: Home could simply be a test to see if an all-Facebook OS or smartphone is feasible.
The really interesting question is whether Google will ever tire of this type of fragmentation of the Android user experience.
We've already seen Amazon
(NASDAQ:AMZN) use a forked version of Android to drive traffic to its own App stores, which is a commercialization of Android that does not at all help to build the Google-branded Android ecosystem. (See: Amazon's Kindle Fire HD Is a Menace to Android and a Friend to the iPad
Additionally, smartphone manufacturers like HTC and Samsung
(PINK:SSNLF) already slap their own customized skins on top of Android.
And now, Facebook Home is altering the Android interface in yet another way.
This strongly contrasts with Apple's strategy of emphasizing simplicity and consistency, which has an ancillary benefit in that it makes app development way easier.
Could you imagine if Facebook tried to put Home on the iPhone, especially under Steve Jobs?
Forget thermonuclear. I bet Steve Jobs would walk straight into Facebook headquarters, look Mark Zuckerberg in the eye, and say, "I'ma get medieval on your app!"
And he'd kind of be right to do so.
What's the point of building a brand and user experience if anyone's allowed to walk in and twist it around for their own financial ends?
There's a reason Microsoft
(NASDAQ:MSFT) still has the majority of PC market share (though that market is certainly not easy right now). There's consistency in the user experience between devices. If you use a Windows PC at work, you'd probably get one for home because you would know how to use it.
The long-term danger is that Android itself becomes in effect a dumb pipe leading to other companies' pocketbooks.
Look at what's happening now: On the Samsung Galaxy S4 website
, I can't find any mention of Android.
Same with the HTC First site.
What do you think? Does Samsung want to sell Android? Or does Samsung want to sell Samsung?
Google Fiber Isn't the Telco-Dropping Sucker Punch We Need It to Be
The PC Isn't Dead, It's Just Gone 'Ultramobile'
A Budget iPhone Is a Bad Idea
Tech News: Apple Scores Patent for Selling Music Offline
Position in AAPL
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.