|
|
|||
| After New York Times Hacking, Check Point Is Up | |||
By Josh Wolonick FEB 01, 2013 4:00 PM |
|||
Cybersecurity firms are likely to see increased interest from investors. |
|||
Symantec is right in that anti-virus software is surely not enough to protect against hacking, particularly for large companies that work with sensitive information. The company promotes its capabilities for defending against sophisticated attacks using various systems at once. But those attacks are liable to become even more sophisticated, and so too is the defense. It should be noted, however, that Symantec was the company that failed to notice the hacking at the New York Times for a whole four months. That being said, Symantec's stock is still up since the news broke, just not as high as Check Point's.Advanced attacks like the ones the New York Times described...underscore how important it is for companies, countries, and consumers to make sure they are using the full capability of security solutions. The advanced capabilities in our endpoint offerings, including our unique reputation-based technology and behavior-based blocking, specifically target sophisticated attacks. Turning on only the signature-based anti-virus components of endpoint solutions alone are not enough in a world that is changing daily from attacks and threats. We encourage customers to be very aggressive in deploying solutions that offer a combined approach to security. Anti-virus software alone is not enough.