Two Charts That Explain Why the Market Should Be Worried About Bunds

By Howard Simons  JAN 22, 2013 9:55 AM

A better name for the eurozone project? Alfred E. Newman's European Vacation.

 


Most of us have developed ingenious and sometimes productive methods of procrastination, such as cleaning out the garage and even organizing the garden tools in alphabetical order when we are supposed to be doing the taxes. But what happens when an entire market decides in its collective wisdom to ignore the 800-pound gorilla waltzing about the room while obsessing over a fluttering moth?

This is happening in the world of swap spreads in the eurozone, a fancy name for those parts of the European Union who thought it wise to give up drachmas and lira to reap the many benefits of the common currency including a regional average unemployment rate of 11.8% and youth unemployment rates so high in certain countries as to be meaningless. In regards to the last statement, whenever you see unemployment rates on the order of 40-50%, you probably are looking at an underground economy wherein barter has replaced detectable and taxable activity.

The Inverted Swap Spread Market

Benchmark interest rates in the eurozone hit negative levels during last year’s iteration of the rolling sovereign debt crisis, not to be confused with the crises of 2010, 2011, or whatever the fates have in store for us in 2013. You still can pay 0.078% to lend money to Germany for one month and they will let you lend them money for free for a three-month period. Nominal ten-year bund yields are just under 1.61% at the time of this writing, and with a harmonized CPI of 2.0%, that works out to a real yield of -39 basis points.

So what are our various freunden, amigos, and φιλους worried about these days? As evidenced by the swap spread market, they are not worried about a rise in long-term interest rates so much as they are about a rise in short-term interest rates. The higher a swap spread moves, the more willing a floating-rate payor is to fix rates; think of it as insurance against floating rates moving higher. 

The chart below shows a strong inversion in the term structure of swap spreads. Not only are shorter-dated spreads higher than longer-dated ones, but they moved higher more quickly when Mario Draghi announced recently he was not looking to become more stimulative.



Ten Years After

Now let’s take a look at ten-year bund yields mapped against ten-year swap spreads. Yields have been rising since late July, right when the aforementioned Draghi pledged to do “whatever it takes” to save the euro. They are now 0.44% higher, a considerable jump off of a 1.167% starting point. Ten-year swap spreads have plunged from 52 to 19 basis points on the notion that “whatever it takes” will involve printing sufficient euros to keep sovereign yields low.



What would happen to the price of those ten-year bunds if yields crept back up to even the August 2010 pre-Jackson Hole level of 2.2%? The on-the-run bund is priced now at 99.02 at a 1.607% yield. At 2.20%, the price falls to 93.73. That is a 5.34% loss; it also wipes out about three and a half years of coupon income.
 
The risk/reward of such a trade is poor. Markets do not sell off when people are expecting them to sell off; they sell off when no one is insuring against the adverse event, and the continuation of unrealistic pricing depends on government and central bank policies capable of changing instantly and without warning. Bund-based ETFs such as Pimco’s Germany Bond Index (NYSEARCA:BUND) have had a nice run, but with yields so low and the euro having rebounded strongly already, why be a schweinhund?
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.