Agribusiness ETFs Could Be in for Tough 2013

By  DEC 26, 2012 2:00 PM

A case can be made that some agribusiness ETFs are laggards relative to the risks this sub-sector presents.


Editor's Note: This content was originally published on by The ETF Professor, Benzinga Staff Writer.

The Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (NYSEARCA:MOO) is up 10.5% this year. That would appear to be a decent gain, but when considering the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSEARCA:SPY) has outperformed MOO by nearly 300 basis points with 430 basis points less in volatility, a case can be made that some agribusiness ETFs are laggards relative to the risks this sub-sector presents.

That laggard status could be reborn next year amid expectations for lower potash prices. China and India, the world's two largest consumers of the crop nutrient, have been delaying signing new contracts with North American suppliers, some of which are constituents in MOO and rival agribusiness ETFs.

India has started negotiations with potash producers and it is expected that China will do the same in January or February. Problem is that the two emerging markets economic superpowers are poised to get their largest potash price reduction in three years, Bloomberg reported.

Analysts at Credit Agricole Securities USA, Dahlman Rose & Co., and Goldman Sachs expect China and India could pay as little as $430 per ton for potash next year, according to Bloomberg. That is down from the current level of $490 per ton paid by India and $470 per ton paid by China.

Should China and India be successful in negotiating their potash prices down to $430 per ton (or lower), that news could present a near-term cap on upside for MOO and the rival iShares MSCI Global Agriculture Producers Fund (NYSEARCA:VEGI).

To be fair to MOO, the ETF is home to 51 stocks and non-potash holdings include Monsanto (NYSE:MON), Deere (NYSE:DE), and Archer-Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM). That trio represents 19.5% of MOO's weight. VEGI, which debuted in January and is home to 135 stocks, allocates about a quarter of its weight to that trio.

That is to say both ETFs have some insulation from fluctuating potash prices. "Fluctuating" might be too kind of an assessment. Potash prices flirted with $485 per ton earlier this year, but now reside closer to $425.

Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (NYSE:POT), the world's largest producer of its namesake fertilizer, Russia's Uralkali, Mosaic (NYSE:MOS), and Agrium (NYSE:AGU) combine for about 21% of MOO's weight and 19% of VEGI's weight. Making matters potentially worse for potash producers is that the crop nutrient has come nowhere close to returning to its pre-financial crisis highs. Back then, potash traded traded over $800 per ton and even flirted with $900.

Of course it can be said that potash probably overshot on the way up and $800 per ton should have never been seen in the first place. However, potash prices are down this year despite higher grain prices.

"To see negative growth in a period of strong, albeit volatile, grain prices suggest to us that… there is lack of understanding of the merits of using potash in some developing markets, where the growth is supposed to come from," according to Credit Suisse. The bank is forecasting Vancouver spot potash prices of $445 per ton next year and in 2014.

Arguably, the market has already started pricing in rough times ahead for potash producers. On average, shares of Agrium, Mosaic and Potash have tumbled 4.83% in the past three months. MOO, by far the largest agribusiness ETF with $5.58 billion in assets under management, has risen 1.5% over that time. Still, that means investors would have been better off with a broader materials ETF such as the iShares S&P Global Materials Sector Index Fund (NYSEARCA:MXI).

MXI, which does have some agribusiness exposure via Monsanto, Potash, and others, is up nearly 4% over the past 90 days. Bottom line: Agribusiness ETFs may not be subject to massive declines in 2013, but with buyers holding the best cards in potash price negotiations, investors would do well to find materials ETFs with reduced potash exposure.

Employee Happiness and Investor Returns: Do Correlations Exist?

Netflix Has a Bone to Pick With Amazon

Apple to Release Thinner, Lighter iPad?

Twitter: @Benzinga

Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.