S&P Bullish on Select Dividend ETFs

By Benzinga.com  OCT 26, 2012 3:33 PM

With yields on many dividend stocks above those of the 10-year Treasuries and money-market accounts, investors have been pouring cash into equity-based ETFs.

 


With yields on many dividend stocks above those of 10-year Treasuries and money market accounts, investors have been pouring cash into equity-based dividend ETFs. That is a good idea, according to the views of S&P Capital IQ in a new research note.

Even under a fiscal cliff scenario that would likely see the top rate on dividend taxes surge, S&P is bullish on dividend ETFs, saying, "We expect that dividends will continue to have appeal as a form of income, and that corporate America could choose to increasingly utilize cash for special dividends before new tax law goes into effect, or for stock repurchases. Also, while equity ETFs are subject to the price volatility that stock ownership brings, they also typically offer diversification among their holdings."

In the note, S&P highlighted six equity-based dividend ETFs, rating three Marketweight and the other three Overweight. The three ETFs to earn the Marketweight rating are the nearly $11 billion iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index Fund (NYSEARCA:DVY), the WisdomTree Dividend ex-Financials Fund (NYSEARCA:DTN), and the WisdomTree Equity Income Fund (NYSEARCA:DHS).

DHS is the best performer of that trio on a year-to-date basis with a gain of almost 9%. The other funds are each up barely more than 7%. DHS also nudged DTN and DVY in terms of yield with a 30-day SEC yield of 3.94%, 10 basis points higher than DTN and almost 40 basis points higher than DVY. Eight of the top-10 holdings in DHS are Dow components, including AT&T (NYSE:T), General Electric (NYSE:GE), and Merck (NYSE:MRK).

S&P place Overweight ratings on the Utilities Select Sector SPDR (NYSEARCA:XLU), the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA:SDY), and the iShares High Dividend Equity Fund (NYSEARCA:HDV).

XLU is by far the worst performer of that trio year-to-date with a gain of just 1.7%. Adding to that ETF's cautionary tale is the opinion of some market observers that US utilities are richly valued on a historical basis and relative to foreign equivalents.

In defense of XLU, it is one of the least volatile of the ETFs highlighted by S&P. The research firm said XLU has a beta of just 0.33 against the S&P 500 over the past three years.

SDY, which screens for stocks that have dividend increase track records of at least 20 years, has jumped 7.2% this year while HDV has added 9%.

By merely looking at the top-10 holdings of DHS and HDV, some investors are apt to think the two ETFs are quite similar. The performances of the pair seem to underscore that notion, too. However, it is worth noting that DHS has the higher yield, is home to over 300 stocks (HDV has 76 holdings) and is slightly cheaper than its iShares rival. DHS charges 0.38% per year while HDV charges 0.4%.

Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.



Windows 8 Draws Massive Crowds in Times Square

Euro Holds Steady But 2013 Outlook Is Bleak

Getting Diversification Right--The 90% Solution

Twitter:
@Benzinga

Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.