Nestle (PINK:NSRGY) Builds Momentum in China, $0.45 at a Time

By  SEP 21, 2012 11:05 AM

The government-mandated increase in China's minimum wage means a lot more people should be able to afford Nestle's low-cost consumer products.


Apparently, it makes a difference whether you’re selling $1,000 raincoats or coffee capsules at $0.45 each.

On September 11, luxury-goods maker Burberry (PINK:BURBY) announced that same-store sales for the 10 weeks that ended on September 8 were flat with the same period in 2011. A slowdown in sales growth in China was a big part of the problem. The stock fell 21% on the news.

Two days later, Roland Decorvet, Greater China Chairman for Nestle (PINK:NSRGY), said he expects the company’s sales in China to grow by about 20% in 2012. That would follow 20% growth in 2011. Decorvet projects China sales will grow at a double-digit rate in 2013.

Rising wages in China, a part of the government’s effort to encourage domestic consumption, will increase sales in Nestlé’s coffee and dairy business, as well as at recent acquisitions such as snack and candy maker HSU Fu Chi International and Yinlu Food Group, a maker of ready-to-drink peanut milk and instant canned rice porridge, Decorvet argues.

According to the latest five-year plan, the minimum wage in China is to increase by 13% a year for the next five years. According to Decorvet, that rising income translates into big growth in low-cost consumer goods, such as Nescafe instant coffee or Kit Kat candy bars.

Chinese consumers drink an average of four cups of coffee a year. The average is 150 a year in Hong Kong, 400 a year in Japan, and 600 a year in the United States.

I think you can see the logic behind Nestle’s thinking. The problem, if you’re an investor, is that this story isn’t especially cheap. The stock currently sells for 17.2 times projected 2012 earnings per share. That’s roughly a 5% premium to other global food companies.

Furthermore, the sector as a whole isn’t known for rocketing growth rates. Nestle’s projected 5.3% earnings growth leaves the stock with a PEG ratio (P/E to growth rate) of 3.23.

So let’s be clear what you’re buying for this price: best in class, stable, and predictable growth.

How predictable? From the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010, a period when US GDP growth averaged a not-so-robust annual 2.5% a quarter, Nestle averaged organic growth of 4.6%, versus just 1.5% at peers Kraft Foods (NASDAQ:KFT) and Unilever (NYSE:UL), according to Credit Suisse.

What you think that kind of predictable growth is worth depends to a great degree on what you think the US and global economies will look like over the next 12 to 18 months. The more uncertain you think the growth picture is, the more Nestle shares will be worth to you.

I’m relatively pessimistic about 2013, because I think the chance of the US steering away from the fiscal cliff without damage is relatively small, because I don’t see the current austerity plans in Europe producing significant growth in the eurozone, and because I think China’s transition from a cheap-labor export economy will be long and wrenching. Nestle closed at $63.78 on September 20. My 12-month target price is just $69 a share, for price appreciation of 8.2%. Add in the current 3.3% dividend, and the total return is just 11.5%.

That’s wouldn't be enough for me in many markets and economies, but I think it is a very solid potential return for 2013 from the conservative end of a portfolio. I’ll be adding shares of Nestle to my Jubak’s Picks portfolio today, September 21, with a target price of $69 a share.

Editor's Note: This article was written by Jim Jubak of MoneyShow.

Below, find some more great investing and trading content from MoneyShow:

Slow and Steady Really Does Win

A High-Risk, High-Reward Energy Play

A Junk Bond Winner

Twitter: @TopProsTopPicks
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.