The emergency landing in Singapore of a Qantas Airbus A380 after an “uncontained engine failure” has prompted the carrier to ground the rest of its A380 fleet until an investigation is completed.
Qantas jets have a 100% safety record -- but recent near-misses have raised questions about the airline’s increasing practice of outsourcing maintenance to foreign countries.
Just three days ago, in an interview with Aviation Week
, the executive manager of Qantas engineering, Chris Nassenstein, said of the company’s maintenance structure
, “…on the engine side, it is almost entirely outsourced. In the component business, it depends on the aircraft. We have more and more [outsourced] on newer aircraft types. At the moment, almost all of the components on the A380 are outsourced.”
Steve Purvinas of the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association believes this is a contributing factor
to a steepening decline in safety.
“The dramatic increase in the number of safety incidents involving Qantas jets coincides with an increase in the amount of work that is no longer carried out in-house. We have seen some pretty horrid results of maintenance from the overseas facilities - things that aren't reported in the press.”
Purvinas points to a Boeing
(BA) 747 that, upon returning from a maintenance check in Hong Kong last year, flew for an entire month before anyone realized three of the aircraft’s engines were not bolted to the wings correctly.
“In the last 10 years, Qantas has shut down every in-house engine shop in Australia,” Purvinas added. “It is little wonder safety standards are dropping.”
But, lowered safety standards are not an exclusively Australian phenomenon. The major US carriers have been offshoring maintenance for years in an attempt to cut costs and increase profits in an increasingly difficult economic environment.
A 2008 audit by the Department of Transportation’s Office of the Inspector General identified nine carriers -- Continental Airlines
(CAL), Delta Air Lines
(AAI), Alaska Airline
s (ALK), America West
(LCC), and Northwest
-- that outsourced 71% of their heavy airframe maintenance checks in 2007. About 27% of these heavy airframe repairs were outsourced overseas. Drilling down a bit deeper, approximately 20% of airplanes are being maintained in developing countries.
In January of last year, a US Airways flight between Omaha and Phoenix made an emergency landing in Denver after the pressure seal around the main cabin door failed.
by NPR found that the Aeroman repair facility in El Salvador, which had maintained the plane, had installed a component backwards, which was directly responsible for the potential catastrophe.
NPR also reported that “the mechanics were paid between $5,000 and $10,000 per year, and some did not speak English, making the reading of the aircraft repair manual impossible.”
An October 26 article in Flightglobal
magazine, ST Aerospace president Chang Cheow Teck, said
, “Aircraft operators will require a certain minimum maintenance volume to cover the cost before in-house maintenance is a viable option. We expect outsourcing to grow corresponding to the cost pressures felt by airlines as a result of intensifying competition.”
“The cost for us to do anything other than the work we perform today would be enormous
," said JetBlue vice-president of technical operations Dave Ramage. “Engine maintenance is an enormous cost and quite frankly we couldn't make the business case and we don't have the critical mass.”
The outcome of Tuesday’s elections will likely lead to more outsourcing, not less.
Bloomberg reports that US carriers will work with Republican legislators
to scrap Democratic proposals that would have limited maintenance outsourcing.
Louie Key, National Director of the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Organization, says
, “The bottom line is the airlines ship jobs to repair stations because labor is cheaper. It’s cheaper because foreign shops are cutting corners with employees. That’s putting people at risk and keeping those jobs overseas.”
Case in point -- just this past March, United signed a five-year deal
with Ameco Beijing to service its entire fleet of 747s and 777s.
Is this really a chance airlines should be taking when faulty aircraft maintenance is the number two cause of accidents?
Just something to ask yourself next time your flight hits turbulence.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.