There’s an interesting article
in today’s Wall Street Journal
discussing the efforts of various computer OEMs to counter the recently introduced Apple
(AAPL) iPad. According to the article, executives at Acer, Dell
(SNE), et al are at various stages of tweaking, evaluating, and/or analyzing products and the market demand for them.
So what’s wrong with this picture? The same thing that was wrong in the fall of 2008 after the introduction of the iPhone.
Apple may have been the first to put a touchscreen on a cell phone, but other than that there’s nothing in that phone that’s wasn’t available to its competitors with the exception of a little imagination, creativity, and willingness to take a risk. Yet, in the months that followed, the conga line formed of me-too products from a wide variety players. Maybe the only exception to that would be Nokia
(NOK) which has still yet to introduce a competitive smartphone more than 18 months after the introduction of the first iPhone.
What is it in the DNA of Motorola
(MOT), Sony-Ericsson, Samsung, LG, Nokia and a dozen others that they're incapable of creation and can only copy? Do the bean-counters control the process and thereby stifle risk-taking? If so, what's that saying to investors?
Fast-forward now to the present and we have Mike Abary, a vice president in Sony’s Vaio PC division announcing that, "For us, the iPad launch is a benchmark." I’m sorry Mr. Abary but why are you waiting for your competitor to define a market segment for you? Why is Sony not the benchmark?
There appears to be an acceptance on the part of these companies that the introduction of a product by Apple somehow legitimizes a market segment for consumers. Really? Anybody remember the Newton or Pippen? Maybe it’s just because consumers realize Apple is willing to push the envelope and take risks. Consequently, their products need to be considered, given their track record. They don’t all work, but some do. And when that happens, the playing field shifts in Apple’s direction.
Far too many companies have track records that amount to little more than turning out another bowl of oatmeal. And consumer’s reactions are all to frequently saying, “Been there, done that!”
Get off your butts guys, guys (and girls). You’ve all got the same Legos but you need to start putting them together differently. IBM
(IBM) used to publish (maybe they still do) a magazine called Think
. Maybe it’s about time to start.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.