Dead Banks Walking?

By Bennet Sedacca  AUG 25, 2008 2:15 PM

Short list of troubled institutions.

 


Editor's Note: The following piece was a collaboration with Minyanville professor Rob Roy.

"Dead Man Walking": Originally a phrase in a poem by Thomas Hardy in 1909, but later in a work of non-fiction by Sister Helen Prejean, A Roman catholic nun and one of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Medaille. Prejean later wrote ‘Dead Man Walking’ which became a hit movie in 1995.

Death Row: A term that refers to the section of a prison that houses individuals awaiting execution. It is also used to refer the state of awaiting execution, even in places where a special section does not exist. As of 2008, there were 3,263 prisoners awaiting execution in the United States.

The Last Mile: "I guess sometimes the past just catches up to you, whether you want it to or not. Usually death row is called ‘The Last Mile’. We call ours The Green Mile’—the floor was the color of faded limes."
-
Tom Hanks as Paul Edgecomb (The Green Mile)

Are there corporations that are "dead men walking"? When I first started in the industry in 1981 I was worried but about just one company, the Chrysler Corporation. Prior to that, Continental Illinois was in the forefront. Later in my career, in 1998, it was Long Term Capital Management, the hedge fund founded by John Meriwether, that captured my attention. Then we had Enron/WorldCom, and by early 2008 Bear Stearns became a worry and then a problem that needed fixing.

All of these events were isolated and dealt with, often with either direct assistance from Uncle Sam or an effort coordinated by America's benevolent/socialist government financial authorities. Markets would become unnerved, fear would grow, and then the government stepped in to make sure that the systemic risk that had finally come to the surface didn’t melt the entire planet.


Want top traders to sit at your desk and share their insight and ideas?
Minyanville's Buzz and Banter- 14 day FREE trial


But this is where it's "different this time" - not only is it different, I think it may be unprecedented in nature. When I look at my Bloomberg monitor each day that contains my 100 most important indices, companies, commodities, bonds, bond spreads, preferred shares, etc., I shudder. The reason for my concern is that my screen doesn’t have just one "problem child." It looks like a screen that contains many "dead men walking."

The Failed Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Experiment

I recently wrote a piece entitled A Tale of Two Markets, where I talked about the "Fannie Mae (FNM)/Freddie Mac (FRE) experiment." To me, that experiment has now clearly failed and a bailout/privatization/nationalization of Fannie and Freddie is probably being planned right now. While I have been expecting nationalization for quite a while, I am intrigued along with my peers and colleagues as to why the bailout is taking so long to accomplish. This is where, in my opinion, it gets interesting and dangerous from a systemic point of view. My hunch is that the reason for the delay is that the Treasury Department is "peeling back the onion" on Fannie/Freddie and finding out just how much of a mess the two of them are.

At last count, Freddie had Level 3 Assets of $151 billion while Fannie had $65 billion, for a not-so-paltry sum of $216 billion. When Freddie announced their results a couple of quarters back, it disclosed that most of its Level 3 Assets were of the "sub-prime" variety (the type of assets that started the whole credit crisis in the first place). The company's also littered with Alt-A mortgages and are leveraged to the hilt.

Just how bad is the news at Fannie/Freddie? On Friday morning, Moody’s downgraded their outstanding preferred stock 5 notches from A1 to Baa3 (a slight gradation above junk) and their Bank Financial Strength Ratings (BSFR) to D+ from B- (a one-half notch above D, which is reserved for companies in default). According to Moody’s:

"The downgrade of the BFSR reflects Moody’s view that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s financial flexibility to manage potential volatility in its mortgage risk exposures is constricted ... in particular, given recent market movement, Moody’s believes these companies currently have limited access to common and preferred equity capital at economically attractive terms."

Dead men walking defined. Moody’s went on to say:

"The GSEs' more limited financial flexibility also restricts their ability to pursue their public mission of providing liquidity, stability and affordability to the US housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac currently make up approximately 75% of the mortgage market in the US. A reduction in the capacity of these companies to support the US mortgage market could have significant repercussions for the US economy. In an effort to thwart broader economic effects, Moody’s believes the likelihood of direct support from the United States Treasury has increased."

"We the People" are about to become owners in Fannie and Freddie, whether we like it or not. The capital markets have shut on them both as their stocks trade in the $2-5 range, down from the $70-80 level just a year ago. And the yield on the outstanding preferred shares hovers in the 18-23% range: Quite the bargain if they keep paying, but also it's the market’s way of saying "Beware the value trap" as the preferred shares may pay another dividend or two, but that's about it.

When the Treasury peels back the onion, I believe they will find a hornet’s nest. So I think we will see an initial bailout of $100 billion or so, with 2/3rds to 3/4ths going to Fannie as it's a larger organization. The scenario I foresee, however, (just as has happened at Merrill Lynch (MER), Lehman Brothers (LEH) and Morgan Stanley (MS)), is that they came to the financing window expecting to have borrowed enough, and then they have to keep coming back repeatedly until the buyers go away, until "We The People" have thrown at least $500 billion at Fannie/Freddie to get them back on their feet again. This will also likely take an Act of Congress to raise the Treasury’s Debt ceiling quite dramatically.

Who might be the other "dead men walking"?

More Dead Men Walking: Is There a Pattern?

What strikes me the most about impaired companies, whether they are automakers, airline companies, banks, brokers or GSE’s is that they seem to sing the same tune, that there is a pattern of behavior. This is how I have attempted to identify in the past what would be in trouble in the future (whether that was just to avoid their stocks and bonds from the long side or to try to profit from their missteps on the short side).

It's a pattern that isn't terribly dissimilar from the emotion charts I like to focus on so much. But in the graphic below, I will run this analysis on banks. I call this cycle the “Dead Man Walking Cycle.”

The first "tip-off" or "tell" is when a company releases earnings or some sort of positive announcement and the stock falls. Another important tell is the credit spreads of the debt of the company begins to widen. Then, the company will usually announce that "all is well and is so great that we will buy back stock and not cut the common dividend." After this comes the "acceptance" phase and write-offs/write-downs are announced and that some sovereign wealth fund or private equity firm will inject capital or that a company within the same group will buy a "strategic stake." After a brief pop in the stock and short covering rally, the stock begins to fall further and credit spreads begin to blow out and preferred shares get hammered. Then, more write-downs and more write-offs and another capital raise and finally a dividend cut to "preserve capital."

Sound familiar yet? All of this goes on for quite some time, until your stock price is so low that you would have to issue so many shares in a secondary offering that you dilute your shareholder base until it is unrecognizable. With this new share offering your credit, while still rated investment grade, trading like junk, your preferred shares rise to double digit yields. Further, the former strategic buyers, sovereign wealth funds and private equity firms, have taken such a beating that there are no further buyers. Yet the write-downs and write-offs continue unmercifully as the economy slows and credit is all but cut off. Eventually, dividends go to zero and you are a "dead man walking."

There are only a few things that can happen to the companies that are walking "The Green Mile." Either you make it to the electric chair (in The Green Mile it was called "Old Sparky") and cease to exist or you are eventually forced into the arms of a better capitalized institution. Over time, I expect a bit of both but mostly of the latter.

Keep in mind that if too many are allowed into the arms of "Old Sparky," it will have a systemic effect as all the institutions are so intertwined, because when one group of institutions are forced to mark their bonds to market, others are forced to do the same, ending in an ugly daisy chain. I think the chain has formed and that many are about to "walk the Mile."

In the end, perhaps years from now, I feel it's likely that many banks and brokers will be merged into an international list of "good banks" or "Live Men Walking." Who are these "Live Men Walking"?

They will likely be Bank of America (BAC), Bank of New York (BK), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Northern Trust (NTRS), State Street (STT), US Bancorp (USB), ABN Amro , Deutsche Bank (DB), BNP Paribas, Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays (BCS), Allianz (AZM) and a few others.

Here's an illustration of the cycle in which a good bank might fall into the "Dead Man Walking" category

Who Are the Dead Men Walking?

In the cycle above, it begins with denial, and ultimately ends up in despair. At first, the company denounces that anything is wrong, but Mr. Market has a way of sniffing out who is imitating Pinocchio. Ultimately, they company ends up in "despair" when they need or want to raise capital to just be able to function normally, but alas, they can't because the window of opportunity to raise capital has shut.

Let’s use Lehman Brothers as the poster child of this sort of behavior. I wrote a piece last week that singled out National City (NCC), Washington Mutual (WM) and Lehman Brothers as three problem children. Before the credit crisis started, Lehman, at the time known for its savvy timing, suddenly came to market for $5 billion of long-term bonds when it didn’t need capital, or did they know something was awry, as I suspect? Last year, with the credit crisis in its infancy, Lehman announced a $100,000,000 stock buyback. The shares, as you would expect, popped on the news, but no stock was ever re-purchased. As the stock began to sell off, the company kept saying that capital was not needed.

Then, on June 9, 2008, it sold 143,000,000 shares at $28 per share. As the hedge fund manager David Einhorn said, "They've raised billions of dollars they said they didn't need to replace losses they said they didn't have." In between was an enormous preferred stock deal: 75,900,000 shares at $25 per share at a rate of 7.95%. Those shares now change hands at $15 per share for a yield of 13.1%. It's pretty hard to turn a profit when your cost of capital is greater than 10%.

During this time, the company actually raised its common dividend by 15% year-over-year back in January. They have written off north of $8 billion since the credit crisis began and when they release earnings (or lack thereof) next month, estimates are for another round of $2-4 billion of write-downs. They have reportdely been trying to shop $40 billion of impaired real estate and they are mired in all sorts of Alt A, sub-prime, CMBS and CDO’s and CLO’s. An interesting note: It said it "shrank its balance sheet" when, in fact, it was sold to an "off balance sheet subsidiary" that it owns part of. The bonds weren’t sold: They were just "relocated." I sure wish I could do that when I make a mistake. Also, the Federal Reserve opened up the discount window to primary/dealers so that they could off-load a bunch of nuclear waste, in my opinion, onto the Fed’s balance sheet, which now looks like one big hedge fund in drag. And then the SEC temporarily changed short selling rules for the Group of 19 (the GSE’s and primary dealers) for a few weeks, resulting in a short squeeze, but their shares still hobble along at recent lows.

On Friday, there was a rumor that the Korean Development Bank would buy Lehman, but again that turned out to not be true. And if it wanted to raise debt, it could prove difficult. Its bonds trade around +500 basis points to Treasuries, but my guess is that even if they could get a deal done, they would have to come in the 10% range, which is, again, uneconomic.

So now we have the recipe and an example for ‘Dead Men Walking’:
 

Below are some other banks with the Dead Man Walking cycle and analysis applied:

Zions Bancorp (ZION)
 

KeyCorp (KEY)
 

Fifth Third Bank (FITB)
 

Washington Mutual
 

National City 
 

Regions Financial
 

General Motor/GMAC (GM)
 

Ford/Ford Motor Credit Co. (F)
 

Wachovia (WB)
 

CIT Group (CIT)
 

Who is in the ‘Limping but Not Dead Walking Crowd’?

These companies would include those that may be ‘too big to fail’, have enough quality assets to sell, a franchise that is worth something to an acquirer or could just be broken up into pieces. They include: Citigroup (C), Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Suntrust (STI), Legg Mason (LM), Capital One (COF), AIG (AIG), MetLife (MET), Prudential (PRU).

Summary: This is Not Shaping Up to be a Pretty Couple of Years

As I stated earlier, when we have just one or two firms with issues, we can deal with it. But when we add rising unemployoment, explosive debt growth in recent years and non-performing assets to many hobbled financial institutions with trillions of dollars of exposure, it's hard not to be concerned.

For this reason, I remain cautious towards credit, expect a hard sell-off in stocks into 2010, consolidation in the financial services industry and some pain, like it or not. I'm just not sure where the capital will come from to bail everyone out simultaneously. And even if the capital showed up, it would likely come at a cost that is uneconomic and would be dilutive for many years to come.

It's why I expect much lower than consensus earnings across the board and lower stock prices ahead. In the meantime, I sit with my historically cheap GNMA’s at the widest spreads in 20 years and continue to add to that position.

In the meantime I position my portfolio so that if I'm wrong, the most I can lose is opportunity, not precious capital.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.