Deregulation to Blame for Madoff Fiasco

Guy Bennett  Dec 16, 2008 10:15 am

Deregulation to Blame for Madoff Fiasco
 
"Free-market" doctrine allowed perpetration of epic fraud.
 

 
“Given what the SEC claims is the magnitude of the fraud, this is something you would hope an inspection would have uncovered,” said Mercer Bullard, a former mutual-fund attorney at the SEC. “It’s hard to imagine a fraud of this alleged size not being accompanied by significant and pervasive compliance problems.”

But it’s actually very easy to imagine. The SEC only has about 800 investigators. They target companies that smell rotten from a hundred paces. Madoff was an old boy, former chairman of the NASDAQ and head of the trading committee at the Securities Industry Association. He knew what perfume to wear.

The $50-billion Madoff fiasco happened for the same reason the subprime mortgage debacle happened: It was allowed to happen. Our lawmakers and politicians were bribed to shut their eyes and look the other way.

In corporate and commercial law, there’s a legal requirement that every contract be negotiated in “good faith.” Good faith is defined as “the observance of honorable intent and the avoidance of any attempt to deceive.”

So how is a major bank allowed to go into a poor neighborhood and sell mortgages to people with “teaser rates” that triple a year later? Why is a guy like Madoff allowed to shuffle around tens of billions of dollars without any branch of the government glancing over his shoulder to see what he’s up to?

Our priorities have become random and perverse. We spend $6 billion a year incarcerating 300,000 American men and women guilty of drug offenses. We're supposed to be grateful to our government for keeping these nasty criminals away from us, while we applaud the purity of the “free-market economy” that encourages guys like Madoff to rip us off.

Mark and Andrew Madoff did the right thing by turning their father in. I doubt it was easy. I suspect he was a good, loving dad. I predict, as the case goes to trial, that coverage will focus on Madoff’s personality flaws, the warning signs, and his dramatic fall from grace.

But that’s trivial. What’s important, and worth discussing, is that Americans are so deathly afraid of “regulation” that we meekly allow ourselves to be swindled.
 

Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (51) See All Comments »
12-17-2008, 12:00 pm
Possibly. Possibly. But it's hard to say since there is no evidence. Prohibition didn't reduce alcohol usage, it just turned it into a crime and some would argue that prohibition increased usage.

People generally view it
Read More
12-17-2008, 12:03 pm
I'd disagree. We are not arguing for "let the buyer beware". We are all for regulation of a meaningful sort.

Have you not seen that Madoff's regulators WILLINGLY avoided reviewing him? Enforcement is key.
Read More
12-17-2008, 12:06 pm
THIS
Read More
12-17-2008, 12:58 pm
discussing the Madoff scandal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N--WArBxGk

"the SEC is totaly inept..."
Read More
12-17-2008, 1:07 pm
Dear Guy,

We're clearly sitting on the same side of the gridiron. But I object to some of your language:

"Astonishingly" congress (they don't deserve a capital, nor should anyone be astonished.) Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert