May the Best Brand Win: Internet Explorer vs. Netscape Mike Schuster Feb 17, 2009 8:50 am |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||
| more May the Best Brand Win » | |||||
|
Internet adoption was slow and gradual, back when there were only a few ways to surf the web. In the early days of online browsing, CompuServe, Prodigy and America Online (TWX) were industry standards; the seemingly infinite Internet was confined to only a handful of software choices.
In 1994, however, a company named Mosaic debuted a fairly intuitive program that allowed users to visit websites quickly and easily. Mosaic named the program Netscape and provided the browser free to non-commercial users. Mosaic, run by a cadre of geeks' geeks, operated under the noble assumption that the Internet should remain free.
Coupling an attractive graphical interface with a revolutionary loading method -- text and graphics would appear in succession as they loaded, rather than everything appearing all at once after endless minutes of load time -- Netscape was a huge success; at its height, it had a remarkable 80% market share.
But along came Microsoft (MSFT) and, as Yoda would put it, "Begun the browser wars have."
As Netscape's chief distribution was through bundling with PC magazines and mailer discs, Internet Explorer had several legs up on the competition: Microsoft simply loaded it onto its PCs and integrated it into all Windows software. Already commanding 90% market share for operating systems, Microsoft had a built-in audience for its native browser.
|
|---|
Though it's now hard to imagine, Microsoft once put serious time and effort into improving Internet Explorer. The company vastly improved the source code; its browser eventually ran circles around Netscape's outdated and buggy software.
Microsoft then moved in for the kill. The company began a licensing agreement with AOL to mirror Internet Explorer's interface and generate user familiarity. It released a web-authoring tool called FrontPage to promote Microsoft's proprietary code and non-standard HTML tags, leaving Netscape users with websites that never looked quite right.
Those browsing the net in 1997 must also recall the "Viewed Best in Internet Explorer" buttons that appeared on most sites.
Once even Apple had adopted Microsoft's software as its default browser, it was all over for Netscape. AOL bought the doomed company out for $4.2 billion, and Internet Explorer went on to dominate, with a 96% market share by 2002.
But Microsoft can no longer rest on its laurels.
After AOL bought out Netscape, its developers reorganized. With money secured through the buyout, they created a non-profit, open-source project codenamed Mozilla. You may know it better as Firefox.
Mozilla's Firefox now commands a 21% market share and has been nipping at Microsoft's heels for the past few years. Will there soon be a new browser king in town?
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
No positions in stocks mentioned.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















