The Credit Crisis Revisited, Part 2

John Mauldin  Sep 02, 2008 2:30 pm

The Credit Crisis Revisited, Part 2
 
Entering phase two of the crunch.
 

 
What do you do with the current preferred shares? A significant portion is held by banks in their capital base. JPMorgan Chase just wrote down $600 million in Fannie and Freddie preferred shares this week. Many other banks will be doing so as well.

As I noted last week, there are banks that have more than 20% of their capital base in these shares. In today’s current environment, do we want to deal with the costs to the FDIC of even more failed banks? And even if you don’t force a bank into outright failure, you at best limit its ability to function as an efficient market lending agency to local businesses and consumers.
But you can’t just say, “We will cover the preferred shares in banks, but not in personal accounts or in the accounts of other institutions.” It's an all or nothing proposition. A $36 billion proposition.

It's a potential Hobson’s choice. Wipe out the preferreds or wipe out the shareholders of a lot of banks and have the FDIC pick up the costs. By the way, Congress and bank regulators encouraged banks to buy preferred shares by giving them special status and tax breaks.

But what about the $19 billion subordinated debt? That $19 billion is actually on the banks’ books as capital for Fannie and Freddie and not as debt, because there is a clause in the bond that says if the bank is in a situation where it must be bailed out, the interest payments on those bonds can be postponed for 5 years. That allows them to count the debt as capital. If the companies are declared insolvent by their regulators, it could trigger the credit default swaps.

I say "could," because depending on how the “credit event” is characterized, it may allow the seller of the insurance to postpone payment for 5 years as well. Just a technical loophole that I am sure most buyers of said credit insurance did not notice.

And even then, I think it's unlikely that many of the sellers of such credit insurance could make anywhere close to the amount of payments they have contracted for. And since the subordinated debt is precisely what you would want to buy credit insurance on, I bet a disproportionate amount of that $62 trillion in credit default swaps is on the lower-rated debt.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (4) See All Comments »
09-02-2008, 5:15 pm
If Forbes hired you and fired Patrick Rucker not only would todays close of fre and fnm been drastically different but their magazine would be far better and more aligned with the realities of today something they have completely missed.

Read More
09-02-2008, 7:01 pm
The only bright side to bailing out Freddie and Fannie is that it will make Bill Bonner wrong in his prediction of a soft depression.

I guess you mean that the depression will be long and deep.

Taking everyones money - inclu
Read More
09-03-2008, 11:05 am
At the "end of the day" (Lord how I hate that saying) the final analysis will read like the Richard (strange, couldn't use the word Di#k) and Jane Basal Reading Series...See Fannie and Freddie fall. See Fannie and Freddie fail. Se
Read More
09-22-2008, 12:35 pm
I am wondering about the behavioral impact of all these socialist bailouts. Henceforth, employees of organisations in US will take irrational risks without any fear.

Come next economic cycle, it will be interesting to see which sector wi
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert