Moody's List of Riskiest Companies Forgets to Include Moody's-Minyanville

BUSINESS & MARKETS

LIFE & MONEY

VIDEO

COMMUNITY

SUBSCRIPTIONS & PRODUCTS

Moody's List of Riskiest Companies Forgets to Include Moody's

Andrew Jeffery Mar 10, 2009 9:00 am

Moody's List of Riskiest Companies Forgets to Include Moody's


		Rating agency tries to get ahead of defaults.

Make-up calls belong in basketball, not finance.

In an attempt to render itself useful, Moody’s Investors Services (MCO) is issuing a list dubbed “The Bottom Rung,” cataloguing the riskiest 15% of all companies it tracks. The effort, which the company claims is an attempt to get ahead of the looming mountain of corporate defaults, has already ruffled a few feathers.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Eastman Kodak (EK), which appeared on the list, issued a harsh rebuttal last night, saying “Any speculation, however informed, suggesting that Kodak is less than financially sound is irresponsible.”

STOCKS
RELATED ARTICLES
ALSO BY...

Among the list of allegedly shaky companies: Familiar names like Ford (F), General Motors (GM) and Chrysler made the cut, along with airlines AMR Corp (AMR) and US Airways (LCC). Retailers, restaurants and even a few energy firms also appeared in this corporate hall of shame, in addition to chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and chemical manufacturer Georgia Gulf Corp (GGC).

Moody’s, along with fellow ratings agencies Standard and Poor’s (MHP) and Fitch Ratings Services, played a major role in the recent financial market meltdown. Conflicts of interest with debt issuers, faulty models and lax internal controls all led to credit ratings that were unreliable at best, deceptive at worst.

Unfortunately for Moody’s, gone are the days when investors valued haphazard assessments of credit risk. The Bottom Rung, while generating ample work for Moody’s customer-complaints department, isn’t likely to reclaim any of the company’s lost glory.

When a firm that specializes in assessing whether borrowers will repay their debts fails to see the biggest wave of defaults in a generation, it’s safe to say that company isn’t very good at its job.

Minyanville's Jeff Macke said it best last week:

In an environment in which DC is creating and changing the laws of corporate governance on a daily basis, it’s simply lunacy to allow 3 groups complicit in the creation of the underlying problem to go on their merry ways while members of the House endlessly lambast bankers for being bankers. Take the gun away from the 5 year old; suspend the ratings authority of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.

25 of 27 (93%) found this helpful
Rate this article:			(27 Votes)

more FEATURES articles »

Daily Article Index �

tags:

MOODY, RATING

Comments (2)

See All Comments »

Edward Boyson

View Exchanges


03-10-2009, 12:27 pm
No rating agency is better than the ones we have had for over 100 years? I think not. EJB. Read More

Tom Kozal

View Exchanges


03-10-2009, 1:15 pm
In the past I had to deal with rating agencies, as part of a start-up. Take the gun away from the 5 year old, yes, but maybe there will be an accidnet before you can get it. The ratings agencies were a joke, now they are a very sad joke. Read More


discuss this article and more on the mv exchange

No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.