Stocks Return Over Time

Prieur du Plessis  Feb 15, 2008 11:15 am

Stocks Return Over Time
 
Hold to enhance trading.
 

 



Global stock markets and the U.S. markets in particular have displayed a large degree of volatility since the middle of last year and daily fluctuations are now back at levels last seen in 2003. This is shown clearly by the following graph of the daily change in the value of the S&P 500 Index.


Click to enlarge
Source: StockCharts.com


In the nature of stock markets, some investors seem ready to turn tail at the first sign of bad news. On the other hand, there are those who are only interested in knowing whether the current bear phase has bottomed so that they can buy stocks again.

This begs the question: When is the right time to buy stocks? Unfortunately, there is no straightforward answer, but let's consider what the chances would be of losing or making money on the stock market over different holding periods.

Holding Periods

I have asked the research team of my investment firm, Plexus Asset Management, to conduct an analysis of the returns of the S&P 500 Index for different holding periods over the past 51 years (i.e. from the inception of the “new-look” S&P 500 Index in 1957 through 2008). Both price movements and dividends were included in the return calculations.

The following graph and table summarize the research results:


Click to enlarge


The analysis of the one-month holding periods indicated that 36.3% of all the periods resulted in a negative return and that 63.7% of all the periods therefore recorded a positive return. The best one-month period (September 1982) showed a return of 12.1% and the worst month (October 1987) a return of -21.6%, while the average monthly return was 0.9%.

It therefore seems as if the likelihood of a profit over the one-month period is better than the likelihood of a loss, but in view of a probability of 36% investors will still have a tough time knowing how the situation will play itself out.

Unless you have the proverbial crystal ball, why take the risk of investing in the stock market? It is for the simple reason that the situation looks significantly different over longer periods – the longer the investment term, the less chance of ending up in the red.

Looking Ahead

By increasing the investment term to one year, the picture already starts improving. 76.9% of all the one-year periods showed a positive return, i.e. 23.1% of these periods registered negative returns. Furthermore, the best one-year period (August 1982 to July 1983) showed a return of 60.2% and the worst (November 1973 to October 1974) a return of -34.2%. The average return was 11.9%.

As can be expected, investors fared much better over the five-year holding periods. A loss was made in only 8.0% of the periods, while the average return amounted to 10.8% per annum. The best period (September 1982 to August 1987) showed a return of 29.7% per annum, whereas the worst period (April 1998 to March 2003) recorded a return of -3.8% per annum.

Stretching the holding period even longer, not a single one of the 493 rolling ten-year periods produced a negative return. The average return for staying invested for ten years was 11.1% per annum.

Know The Terrain

The research results are not offered as an alternative to sound fundamental and technical models (or perhaps an experienced “gut”) with a track record of having accurately identified entry or exit levels over time. It merely serves the purpose of alerting investors to the stock market’s return profile over different holding periods in order to (1) know what they are “up against" and (2) properly match their investment personalities with investment periods that are optimal for allowing them a good night’s sleep en route to an improved lifestyle.


GET THESE INSIGHTS AND MORE IN REAL-TIME.  CALL 212-991-9357 FOR A 14-DAY FREE TRIAL TO THE BUZZ & BANTER OR CLICK BELOW.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (5) See All Comments »
02-15-2008, 12:28 pm
The statistical analysis you presented is laughable in that it omits the one large deflationary period in the past century--i.e. the Great Depression. If you had invested in, say, the Dow Jones in 1929, it took nearly a quarter of a century just to
Read More
02-15-2008, 12:28 pm
Now, do the same analysis for the period from 1907-1938, 1907-2008, and include adjustments for inflation vs. the buying power of the stock value vs. food, gold, energy, housing.

Oh yeah, one more: Do the same analysis for Rome from 1000
Read More
02-15-2008, 1:56 pm
With many of Minyanville's professors focused on trading, its nice to see an article that talks about investing. Thanks for sharing!
Read More
02-15-2008, 3:48 pm
Another thing to look at is what the average long-term return is at various starting valuations. Using Price-to-Peak-Earnings instead of Price-to-Earnings to eliminate false signals during times of depressed earnings, and you will find that at our c
Read More
02-15-2008, 3:52 pm
I believe that for someone who bought and held in 1929 it took much less than a quarter of a century to break even because dividends are not included in the DJIA. It still took more than 10 years to break even including dividends, though, so your po
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert