Union-Busting for Big Three

Guy Bennett  Dec 09, 2008 11:31 am

Union-Busting for Big Three
 
Broken labor contracts only course of action.
 

 
Even if GM made good cars, the legacy costs would kill the company. When GM made the pension deal in 1962, it had 464,000 US employees, and was paying benefits to 40,000 retirees and their spouses.

So for every retiree, there were about 11 workers on the factory floor. Then they started automating, replacing people with machines. By 2007, the workforce had shrunk to 141,000 - but the company was now paying benefits to 450,000 retirees.

The math doesn’t work. And chucking $25 billion at the Big 3 isn’t going to make it work.

There are only 2 solutions that will work:

One, let the free market do its thing. Reward excellence. Kill the weak. Say goodbye to the Big 3. New US auto companies will emerge, and they will learn from the Big 3’s mistakes and make better cars at higher profits.

Two, execute a managed bankruptcy that will require the automakers to renegotiate their contracts with -- and yes, break their promises to -- the unionized retirees.

Neither of these solutions is pleasant. In fact, both are extremely painful. But the hurt is there anyway. Half a million Americans lost their jobs in November. I know what it’s like to pound the pavement looking for work, worried about my family, my house, my future. Those are long days - but sometimes they’re necessary.

The most important thing is to stay firmly rooted in reality. And the reality is that Toyota (TM) makes better cars than GM. And they aren’t paying billions of dollars to ex-employees.

Another reality is that the system is self-correcting. The US job market is currently flooded with educated, motivated, trained workers. That’s a very good environment for entrepreneurs to start new businesses in.

I believe in democracy. I believe in unions. But I do not believe that GM, Ford or Chrysler can survive in their current form. The bailout is merely a temporary painkiller. It will wear off, and the disease will remain. Better to spend the $25 billion on hiring more elementary school teachers, or building a new electrical grid. That will be better for the economy in the long run.

Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (6) See All Comments »
12-09-2008, 12:12 pm
Premise one: We're going to give them money one way or another.
Premise two: Lets minimize the damage.

Idea: Declare BK or don't, it doesnt matter. The promises made to these old people need to be kept, IMHO, so through
Read More
12-09-2008, 12:17 pm
I like this too! Isn't the corporate structure really part of this problem? Ive had this nagging idea that a perpetual entity legally existing as a person, ran by people who get to hide behind the fake person is the recipe to circumvent all la
Read More
12-09-2008, 9:23 pm
Have much experience with General Motors. The union contracts will have to go. Retirees will have to take their lumps. There is no choice. It's already baked into the pie.

PBGC does not give cost of living increases. No health
Read More
12-10-2008, 7:16 pm
This Krap goes out to Guy Bennett. In theory your solution of eliminating the legacy cost as the only survival option for the big 3 makes sense. You even back your argument up with the 500,000 thousand who lost their job last month and the pain they
Read More
12-11-2008, 11:32 am
Ok, i'll take the bait on a couple of points:

"in 1962, it had 464,000 US employees, and was paying benefits to 40,000 retirees and their spouses.

So for every retiree, there were about 11 workers on the factory
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert