For Banks, Size Does Matter, Part 1

John Mauldin  Sep 08, 2008 12:30 pm

For Banks, Size Does Matter, Part 1
 
Bigger they come, harder they fall.
 

 
Of course, you have to be able to take some losses. If you had a $500,000 loan go bad, you would have eaten up all your profits and dipped into your capital. Now you would have only $900,000 in capital. That means you could only make $9 million in loans. You'll either have to raise more capital from investors or reduce your loan portfolio, in addition to writing off the bad loan.

Now, what constitutes capital at real-world banks is a very complex thing. How much it costs to find money to lend can vary wildly. Many of us “lend” money to our banks at zero cost to the bank via our checking accounts. They pay more for savings accounts, borrowing from other banks, etc., and charge different rates for different types of loans. It's a very complicated business, but the basics of my simple illustration will get us where we need to go.

When I want to find out something about US banks, I turn to PL Capital. They run a fund which invests in smaller banks, and have been consulting with banks for many, many years. They really know the business. I asked Rich Lashley to give me his thoughts, which I've summarized for you below.

In the US, and in much of the developed world, there are about 8500 banks on 2 tiers of banking. The top 50 banks have more than 80% of the assets; the rest are generally much smaller. Excluding 5 states hit particularly hard by the housing crisis (see more below), it's business as usual for most other banks.

There's money for most smaller businesses at smaller banks except for residential development. The true credit crunch is at the top, for larger projects. Want to do a $3 million deal? If you have a reasonable project, it can get financed. Want to do a $300 million deal? Lots of luck, for reasons I note below.

Most of the smaller banks have plenty of capital and are looking to put it to work. Rich guesses there are about 400 or 500 banks (5% of the total, concentrated in states with bad housing markets) which are in some level of financial distress, meaning they need to raise capital or reduce lending. His guess is that we will see about 100-150 banks fail over this cycle. He'd be surprised to see more than 3 top-50 banks fail. Most of the larger banks, if they get into trouble, would be absorbed by better-capitalized banks in search of market share.

In fact, Rich is quite bullish on selected bank shares. 86% of the banks/thrifts in the US made money in the first quarter of 2008, and almost 50% earned more than they made in 2007's first quarter (i.e., they made more money after the credit crunch than before.) But nearly all bank stocks have declined due to the credit crunch. Over time, growing earnings will allow for a rebound.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (3) See All Comments »
09-08-2008, 1:01 pm
But doesn't this mean that most of the US mortgage market (local banks and credit unions) would have been functional without the GSE bailout? In other words, we are bailing out FRE & FNM to save the Chinese and other foreign bond holders, a
Read More
09-08-2008, 2:22 pm
Nope. Recall, the top 50 have 80 percent of the business; and they're the ones in write-down trouble. The big guys ARE "most of the US mortgage market". They need the GSEs as counter-parties; the little banks, not so much - they ar
Read More
09-08-2008, 6:10 pm
Hmmm. Seems to me that the mortgage market would have gone back to George Bailey mode. Rates might have been higher but we'd be safe from another nationwide housing crisis. Once the crisis passed the little banks would grow up to be big ones. <
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert