For Banks, Size Does Matter, Part 1

John Mauldin  Sep 08, 2008 12:30 pm

For Banks, Size Does Matter, Part 1
 
Bigger they come, harder they fall.
 

 
We're entering the next stage of the credit crisis, and one which is potentially more troubling than what we've already seen over the past year (absent some policy reactions by the central banks and governments worldwide).

The crisis was initiated by an intense run-up in leverage by financial institutions and investors worldwide, investing in increasingly risky assets such as subprime mortgages - and then came the realization that leverage could hurt. The deleveraging process started to intensify last year about this time. The easy part of that process is nearly complete. Now is the time for the really hard work. It won't be pretty.

In this week’s letter, we look at the process and think about its implications for the markets and the economy, and we’ll visit some data on the housing market and unemployment.

And just for the record: While the problems I'm describing in this letter are very real, this isn't the end of the world. We'll get through it, just as we've always done.

Thoughts on the Continuing Crisis

Let’s start by explaining the process of de-leveraging in very simplistic terms. On average, FDIC-insured banks now have about 7.89% of capital for their outstanding assets (loans are generally about 60% of assets), so they're roughly levered up by about 12.5 times. Some investment banks are leveraged up to 30 times. Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) are leveraged 50 times. But to make matters simple, let’s assume leverage of 10 times.

(For the record, to be considered “well-capitalized” you have to have at least 5% of capital in Tier One assets, and 10% in what are considered risk-based assets, with anecdotal evidence that regulators want to see 12%.)

That means for every $1 million in capital you have, you can lend out $10 million. The profit you make is the difference between the cost of your capital and money you borrow to lend, and the interest rate you charge. If you're paying 4% for your money and charging 8%, you would make 4% times $10 million, or gross profits of $400,000. That is a return of 40% on invested capital, which is why so many small banks are being started all over the country every year.

Nice business, if you can get it.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (3) See All Comments »
09-08-2008, 1:01 pm
But doesn't this mean that most of the US mortgage market (local banks and credit unions) would have been functional without the GSE bailout? In other words, we are bailing out FRE & FNM to save the Chinese and other foreign bond holders, a
Read More
09-08-2008, 2:22 pm
Nope. Recall, the top 50 have 80 percent of the business; and they're the ones in write-down trouble. The big guys ARE "most of the US mortgage market". They need the GSEs as counter-parties; the little banks, not so much - they ar
Read More
09-08-2008, 6:10 pm
Hmmm. Seems to me that the mortgage market would have gone back to George Bailey mode. Rates might have been higher but we'd be safe from another nationwide housing crisis. Once the crisis passed the little banks would grow up to be big ones. <
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert