A Fiat Inside of a Chrysler? Good Luck.

Scott Reeves  Nov 10, 2009 1:45 pm

A Fiat Inside of a Chrysler? Good Luck.
 
In the US, it will be hard to shake Fiat’s disastrous past.
 

 
Americans love Prada, Gucci, and stylish Italian suits, but will they trust Italian engineering and buy a Chrysler with a Fiat engine?

The Detroit Free Press reported Tuesday that Chrysler is betting Fiat’s small-engine technology will rev sales, but the plan looks like hope trumping reality.

Worse, Chrysler doesn’t plan to introduce a mass-market hybrid car for at least five years. This all but concedes the market to Toyota (TM), maker of the sector leading Prius. Honda (HMC) and Ford (F) are moving more aggressively into the field.

The Chrysler-Fiat deal will help Fiat re-introduce the stylish Alfa Romero to the US market in the future, and by the end of next year Chrysler plans to introduce the Fiat 500 minicar to US drivers. The Fiat 500 was voted Europe’s Car of the Year in 2008.

Chrysler depends heavily on its trucks and sports utility vehicles and tapping Fiat’s line of small, fuel-efficient cars could extend the brand and benefit both automakers.

But neither company has developed a reputation for quality and it will take more than deft advertising to overcome the memories of Fiat’s disastrous foray into the US market in the 1970s. The consistently poor quality produced a standard laugh line: Fiat was an acronym that stood for “Fix It Again Tony.”

Fiat withdrew from the US market in 1983 after sales dwindled to about 14,000. At home, Fiat struggled when the European Union removed trade barriers intended to protect Italian cars from imported competitors. In 1990, Fiat was Europe's second-largest automaker after Volkswagen and now claims about 8% of the European market and 30% of sales in Italy. But that may not be enough to change its poor image in the US.

“Clearly, reliability is a challenge for Chrysler,” Consumer Reports magazine says. “…For those Americans who recall when Fiat cars were sold here, the brand made a less-than-stellar impression. Looking back at reliability ratings from the late 1970s…the Fiat 128 and 131 received a worse overall reliability rating for several years.”

The magazine also cites a British auto trade publication which notes, “Among the 38 brands featured, Fiat ranked 35th, followed by Renault, Land Rover, and Chrysler/Dodge…Fiat, Chrysler, and Dodge are categorized as ‘very poor.’ In total, Fiat, Chrysler, and Dodge provide similar reliability, and it isn’t good.”
19 of 30 (63%) didn't find this helpful
Rate this article:  (30 Votes)
Comments (3) See All Comments »
11-10-2009, 5:24 pm
I bought a new Fiat 124 Spider in 1976, paid maybe $8,000. I put 80,000 mi on it over 10 yrs (used a Jeep for some of the winter). I had no mechanical problems at all. Only complaint was the rag top, the original only lasted about 3 yr. Paid $700 for
Read More
11-11-2009, 9:06 am
Is Minyanville becoming the Fiat of financial info sites?
Read More
11-11-2009, 10:41 am
You only THOUGHT you were outrunning the rain. :)
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »RIMM »AMZN »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert