Where Eco Meets Economy Stacia Jesner Mar 10, 2009 8:25 am |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
I began asking myself why we were using all this stuff, and came to realize there wasn't much of a good reason, honestly, except saving the trouble of doing a little more washing up.
What I also realized was that for every item I used once and then tossed, I was contributing to landfills instead of my savings account. The more one-off items I buy, the more I spend -- and of course, the bigger my carbon footprint gets.
Reusable items not only save me money, but also help cut down on the carbon generated through manufacturing new “throwaways.”
Here are three easy ways we were able to reduce our family’s footprint, both economically and ecologically:
Put down that water bottle
Buy one good stainless steel water bottle that your kid uses every day, refilling as necessary, and it's paid for itself in under two weeks. Plus, you have cut hundreds of plastic bottles from being produced (using carbon) and then needing to be recycled (which, of course, uses carbon), or worse, ending up in a landfill. Buy one bottle for each family member, and use a paint pen to decorate and label each one with the owner’s name. (12-ounce Klean Kanteen, $14.95 at kleankanteen.com)
Clean up the way you wipe up
Even buying at bulk warehouse clubs, a roll of brand-name paper towels runs about a $1 a roll; roughly double that if you buy at the grocery store. Rather than grabbing a paper towel every time the counter needs to be wiped down, I now use good old-fashioned dishcloths, which are inexpensive and can be reused over and over. Old t-shirts, cut into squares, work fabulously on glass surfaces and windows. I keep a roll of towels handy for the truly horrendous spill or mess, but now go through about one every two weeks, as opposed to two or three a week.
Say no to single-serves
It’s tempting -- with two kids -- to pack lunches for every morning, to grab the four-packs of individual pudding cups for their lunches, or the boxes of snacks packaged into one-helping bags. But such convenience costs: My son’s favorite fish-shaped crackers run about 80 cents per ounce when I buy ‘em in single-serve packages; 27 cents an ounce when in the 18-ounce box (and that’s not even the mega-warehouse sizes). So we switched to a refillable plastic container that gets washed every afternoon when he comes in, and stocked with new snacks the next morning. Voila!: The cost of snacking just dropped by two-thirds, and our garbage production is down to one recyclable cardboard box.
While each of these steps required a small investment in “reusables,” they quickly paid themselves off and we started saving money. Even though the eco-chic catalogs that pile up on my doorstep keep trying to convince me I need to spend and buy even more to save the Earth, these few smart adjustments to my family's "use and toss" lifestyle created significant savings for us both financially and environmentally.
Best of all, by cutting down on the amount of stuff we throw out, we also save on how many garbage bags we use!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Bio |
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
















