Dow Chemical's Spill Glenn Curtis Jan 28, 2009 8:30 am |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Maybe things aren’t quite that bad at Dow - but it sure has gotten itself into quite a pickle.
In late December, the Kuwaitis nixed a more than $17 billion joint venture with the company, and there’s now an ongoing saga as to whether or not the company will be able to link up with Rohm & Haas (ROH), as had been planned as far back as July. Dow missed its deadline to finalize the proposed joint venture yesterday.
Why is acquiring the smaller chemical company so important, you ask?
A couple of reasons:
1. A combination could add some high-growth products to Dow's arsenal - and could dramatically cut costs.
2. The deal sports a hefty termination fee. Price tag: $750 million.
Trouble is, Dow is in stutter-step mode.
According to a Dow release:
“Dow has determined that recent material developments have created unacceptable uncertainties on the funding and economics of the combined enterprise. This assessment is based on... the continued crisis in global financial and credit markets combined with the dramatic and stunning failure of Petrochemicals Industries Company of Kuwait (PIC) to fulfill its obligation to complete the formation of the K-Dow joint venture in late December 2008.”
Dow had expected the Kuwaiti deal to produce more than $7 billion in cash, which would definitely have gone a long way toward defraying that pesky termination fee. Dow denies, however, that a cash flow problem is what's keeping it from completing the acquisition.
Rohm & Haas, of course, isn’t sitting idle. It’s apparently suing to force the combination to happen. And frankly, I don’t blame them. Their shareholders are stuck in limbo with a $58 or $59 stock, and they want their $78. After all, given this economic environment, a deal like this doesn't come along every day.
And to cap everything off, there are 2 more points to consider.
First, with business having trailed off significantly, Dow's dividend may be on the chopping block.
Second, let’s assume that a deal with Rohm & Haas somehow gets done. According to the company’s own release, back when the deal was first announced: “Dow expects the transaction to be meaningfully accretive to earnings in the second year following completion, with pre-tax annual cost synergies expected to be at least $800 million per year.“
Second year? That might as well be forever, in this environment.
Long story short, I wouldn’t want to be in Dow or Rohm & Haas’ shoes at this point. I’m steering clear.
Have a great day!
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides

















