Dow Chemical's Spill

Glenn Curtis  Jan 28, 2009 8:30 am

Dow Chemical's Spill
 
Rohm & Haas sues over stalled merger.
 

 
Is it just me, or does looking at Dow Chemical (DOW) make the Goodfellas soundtrack play in your head? You remember the part where Henry sees the helicopter flying overhead and realizes his whole world is closing in on him?

Maybe things aren’t quite that bad at Dow - but it sure has gotten itself into quite a pickle.

In late December, the Kuwaitis nixed a more than $17 billion joint venture with the company, and there’s now an ongoing saga as to whether or not the company will be able to link up with Rohm & Haas (ROH), as had been planned as far back as July. Dow missed its deadline to finalize the proposed joint venture yesterday.

Why is acquiring the smaller chemical company so important, you ask?

A couple of reasons:

1. A combination could add some high-growth products to Dow's arsenal - and could dramatically cut costs.

2. The deal sports a hefty termination fee. Price tag: $750 million.

Trouble is, Dow is in stutter-step mode.

According to a Dow release:

“Dow has determined that recent material developments have created unacceptable uncertainties on the funding and economics of the combined enterprise. This assessment is based on... the continued crisis in global financial and credit markets combined with the dramatic and stunning failure of Petrochemicals Industries Company of Kuwait (PIC) to fulfill its obligation to complete the formation of the K-Dow joint venture in late December 2008.”

Dow had expected the Kuwaiti deal to produce more than $7 billion in cash, which would definitely have gone a long way toward defraying that pesky termination fee. Dow denies, however, that a cash flow problem is what's keeping it from completing the acquisition.

Rohm & Haas, of course, isn’t sitting idle. It’s apparently suing to force the combination to happen. And frankly, I don’t blame them. Their shareholders are stuck in limbo with a $58 or $59 stock, and they want their $78. After all, given this economic environment, a deal like this doesn't come along every day.

And to cap everything off, there are 2 more points to consider.

First, with business having trailed off significantly, Dow's dividend may be on the chopping block.

Second, let’s assume that a deal with Rohm & Haas somehow gets done. According to the company’s own release, back when the deal was first announced: “Dow expects the transaction to be meaningfully accretive to earnings in the second year following completion, with pre-tax annual cost synergies expected to be at least $800 million per year.“

Second year? That might as well be forever, in this environment.

Long story short, I wouldn’t want to be in Dow or Rohm & Haas’ shoes at this point. I’m steering clear.

Have a great day!
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comment (0) See All Comments »
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert