BAC to Break $30?

James Kostohryz  Jun 11, 2009 12:10 pm

BAC to Break $30?
 
Morgan Stanley report puts it at $32 -- and maybe more.
 

 
I know some may think I'm some sort of loony tune, or might suspect I make outrageous claims just to attract attention. Quite the contrary: I do serious analytical work, and I take my reputation as an analyst very seriously.

Why do I bring this up? In February, when Bank of America (BAC) was below $4, I wrote a report  in which I presented a model showing that Bank of America was probably worth at least $30. I was called everything from ignorant to a stooge of the government.

On May 8, in an article entitled The Crisis is Over -- For Now, I shared the fact that I'd updated my model and believed that, based on SCAP assumptions, Bank of America was worth $40. People scoffed again.

I was therefore particularly pleased to read today's very in-depth report by Morgan Stanley’s (MS) bank analyst Betsy Graseck. I came to the report by chance; I'd read that she increased her second-quarter earnings estimates this morning, and I was curious to see what Ms. Graseck has been thinking lately. I consider her to be probably the best bank analyst on Wall Street. Nobody's more thorough, technically competent, and more analytically sound in terms of modeling and valuation methodology than she.

Ms. Grasek and I don't know each other. However, she's arrived at 2010-2013 earnings estimates that are very similar to my own. According to Ms. Graseck’s estimates, Bank of America is trading at 3.5 times 2011 EPS, 2.8 times 2012 EPS, and 2.4 times 2013 EPS. Additionally, the company is trading at 0.8 times Tangible Book Value -- which is absurd for a franchise that will be producing a tangible ROE of over 20% by 2011. 

Her price target for Bank of America: $32. I find this extraordinary, since we all know that Wall Street analysts are under a great deal of pressure not to issue price targets too far ahead of the market. But Bank of America is Ms. Graseck’s top pick. And -- based on extensive conversations with the heads of every major division at Bank of America (which she summarizes in detail in her report) -- Ms. Graseck increased her 2009 EPS estimate for the company by about 20%.

With respect to Bank of America, it looks like I now have somebody to take ursine derision with.
36 of 45 (80%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (45 Votes)
Comments (10) See All Comments »
06-11-2009, 6:37 pm
when it comes to banking analysts who aren't afraid to call them like they see them & she has stuck to her guns despite a huge backlash.

in May, she was saying the big banks (BAC, C & JPM) were accelerating the cutting of p
Read More
06-11-2009, 6:46 pm
David:

Have you considered that your comment about managements being optimistic about their companies is so obvious that it is obvious to everyone else as well?

Ms. Graseck is no fool. She knows what questions to ask and
Read More
06-11-2009, 7:10 pm
Yes, Ms. Grasek has been at this a long time. Can we count on her to "apply the proper filter and discount/" Let's check the record.

Here's a quote attributed to Ms. Grasek on July 24, 2007, commenting about ban
Read More
06-11-2009, 9:48 pm
Hi David,

I think you and I are talking about different things. Please note that my comment about thorough interviews of division managers was related to her revision of her 2Q earnings forecast. I make no further claims about the usef
Read More
06-15-2009, 12:23 am
Based on Minyan Fred S. response, below is a link to Yahoo's analyst page. Notice that Ms. Graseck falls under the 'Other Analysts' group. You decide!

130% price target is quite aggressive even 3 years out. Then agai
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
Position in BAC

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert