Quick Hits: AIG Spending Like There's No Tomorrow

Scott Reeves  Nov 03, 2008 1:45 pm

Quick Hits: AIG Spending Like There's No Tomorrow
 
Brief scrutiny of today's headlines.
 

 

American International Group (AIG) has spent about $90 billion of the federal government's $143 billion rescue package, leading some to say it's not enough.

Critics say shareholders and taxpayers would have been better served by a bankruptcy filing, but the point of the bailout was to save the US financial system from collapse - not just to rescue AIG.

The situation is further complicated by by the company's top executives, who have squandered taxpayer money on trips to resorts and England, suggesting the company could benefit from some adult supervision.



AIG's quickly spent about $90 billion, suggesting that it grossly undervalued its obligations to others.

The Fed has twice added to the original $85 billion bailout, already the largest government bailout of a private company in the nation's history. In October, Uncle Sam gave AIG $38 billion more in credit for securities lending in an effort to keep the company from drawing down its first loan too quickly. Last week, the FED agreed to let AIG borrow $20 billion from a larger commercial paper bailout fund it had set up for institutions that lend money to each other.

Earlier this year, investors began making private demands that AIG pay off its billion-dollar guarantees. In mid-September, AIG said it didn't have enough cash to cover its obligations and the company has used the federal bailout money to post collateral demanded by other firms, The Washington Post reports.

Critics say no one else benefits from using the money this way and taxpayers may suffer a significant financial loss. The company may be forced to borrow additional federal money to cover future payouts to others.

The value of the company's mortgage assets is probably declining and that means it must pay a higher price for its guarantees. AIG also may be forced to sell more assets at low prices to raise cash quickly.

Taxpayers now hold about 80% of the company.

The unknown, and perhaps unknowable, part of the calculation: who else goes under if AIG fails?

The purpose of the Fed's bailout is to avoid answering that question.
 

Is there another Lehman Brothers out there?
Minyanville's Buzz & Banter - 14 day FREE trial

Rate this article: (0 Votes)
Comments (4) See All Comments »
11-03-2008, 4:51 pm
So long as Paulson et al are willing to provide government money with considerably better terms than the initial loans, I guess the taxpayer really hasn't been well protected in this AIG bail-out. And, based on the fact that every dollar expe
Read More
11-03-2008, 7:35 pm
Walt, what did we reasonably expect in a culture that believes that AIG is simply an insurance company? Non-voting stock is in the same aisle as no-bid contracts, just on a different shelf. Do you believe that the leverage of Credit Default Swaps i
Read More
11-03-2008, 8:37 pm
From the empirical evidence AIG was two things.

1) A criminal enterprise

2) An incompetent criminal enterprise

Where's the jail time?
Read More
11-13-2008, 11:48 am
"The interest rate was too high!" the god shouted. "They didn't give us nearly enough money!"

But the king of kings also wants the Feds the hell out of his kingdom: "What does the government know ab
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any article or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Markets

our professors

rss article alert