A Modest Proposal for California Scott Reeves Jul 17, 2009 3:10 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
A state slug, cranking his (alleged) brain up to 40 watts, made this calculation: A $50 per ounce wholesale fee, plus the state’s 9% sale tax, would generate about $1.4 billion in tax revenue a year.
Never mind that tobacco is baaaad for you -- and the state would be in the business of flogging a product that makes people stupider than alcohol while gunking up their lungs.
And forget about the fact that, under federal law, growing, possessing, and selling marijuana is illegal. But you can be sure California's legislature would suddenly discover the virtue of Federalism, and maybe even the doctrine of original intent. After all, the Constitution doesn’t say a word about Mary Jane.
The spadework to legalize pot may be underway. The Associated Press reports that there’s a grassroots (oops!) effort underway to put a measure on the state ballot in 2010 that would repeal all state and local laws criminalizing marijuana. Skeptics might argue that repealing local laws throughout the state could conflict with the legislature’s sudden infatuation with the 10th Amendment -- but never mind.
When it comes to searching out sources of tax revenue, why stop at pot?
Prostitution's now legal in some counties in Nevada, so why not make it legal throughout California? Think of the money -- not to mention the opportunity for a new bureaucracy to spread the word about AIDS prevention in state-sanctioned brothels.
Nevada also sucks away California’s gambling dollars to Wynn (WYNN) and MGM (MGM) casinos in Las Vegas and Reno. This has to stop. No doubt, California would want to have state-run casinos to avoid the icky private sector. If so, California casinos would almost certainly be run as a jobs program, and would consistently lose money. Solution: Sell the state parks, and put the land on the tax rolls.
California already taxes the bejabbers out of gasoline in an effort to build mass-transit systems to get commuters to downtowns and employment centers that hardly exist outside San Francisco. Great idea! The state can always use more white elephants and higher taxes.
Why not tax natural food to create a program to enlighten those who eat stuff saturated with sugar? The program could be made permanent by taxing the California farmers who grow sugar beets.
California simply can’t hold its spending to the rate of inflation. But why should it? After all, members of the state legislature need to buy votes with the taxpayers’ money.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
No positions in stocks mentioned.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















