Starbucks Saturation

Vitaliy Katsenelson  Mar 27, 2008 10:15 am

Starbucks Saturation
 
Additional growth won't come easy for coffee chain.
 

 
I just came back from a week-long trip in Europe where I spent four days in Vienna and three days in Sofia (Bulgaria). I was surprised to find very few Starbucks (SBUX) shops in Vienna.

Despite traveling extensively around the city I counted only two. Both are primarily frequented by -- you guessed it -- tourists. I've been told SBUX has closed down a number of stores over the years. After visiting London in August and seeing a SBUX on every corner, I figured the firm had spread the decaying American capitalism evenly around the world. Remember, Britain is a nation that drinks tea - or so we've been told.

The only explanation I could find was that Austrians look at coffee as an experience. Since they pay a couple euros for a tiny little bitty cup of coffee, they figure they may as well enjoy it by spending an hour drinking it. In America we drink the same amount in a sip. Maybe Austrians want their coffee brought to them. Though I have to confess, service in Europe rivals service I receive in the local Post Office on the day before Christmas.


Austria is a country with only eight million people and SBUX’s failure there will not necessarily derail its global growth strategy. But the SBUX failure in Austria -- a western European country where coffee consumption is deeply ingrained in the culture -- makes me pause. Maybe growth from over-caffeinating the rest of the world is not a slam dunk as everyone perceives.

SBUX, along with other high quality companies with strong competitive advantages and an impressive growth track record, have traded at a premium to the market (higher Price to Earnings ratio). There were actually two premiums: one for quality and another for consistent high growth. eBay (EBAY), Whole Foods (WFMI), Wal-Mart (WMT), General Electric (GE) and many more come to mind here. Most of which are in different stages of seeing their growth premium deflated.

When it comes to SUBX, the quality is undoubtedly still there. But the growth premium has been deflating as its expansion has slowed. With 10,000 stores worldwide SBUX is not exactly a spring chicken anymore, and its growth going forward will be lower than it was in the past.

If Austria is any guide the company's ability to grow internationally is less certain. I may buy SBUX in the future once the growth premium is gone and the stock trades with appropriate margin of safety (in my book Active Value Investing I discuss how to figure out how much margin of safety you should require for a stock), but I’ll not pay a premium for (past) growth or its visibility.

P.S. I did not see a single SBUX in Sofia, but paid a visit to a Dunkin Donuts that shared space with KFC (YUM) which in Bulgaria is still called Kentucky Fried Chicken.


For further analysis of the impact of Starbucks' rampant worldwide expansion, check out Hoofy and Boo's unique perspective!
 
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (2) See All Comments »
03-27-2008, 12:29 pm
What sparked my interest in Starbucks years ago was a visit to Europe and noticing that there was already a coffee house on every corner in many cities there - Vienna being one in particular.

Europeans have had cafe saturation for centur
Read More
03-27-2008, 6:42 pm
I understand much of Starbucks' penetration in Europe is done through partnerships. Having only two stores in Vienna is not necessarily a sign of failure, but more likely a sign that they have not been agressive in the country and market. The
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert