No More Call Waiting: Verizon To Buy Alltel Glenn Curtis Jun 05, 2008 10:45 am |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Midway through the trading day Wednesday Wall Street was buzzing about news -- and several media outlets were reporting -- that Verizon Wireless, the well known phone company, was in talks to buy wireless carrier Alltel. Verizon Wireless is jointly owned by Vodafone (VOD) and Verizon (VZ).
CNBC corroborated the rumors, saying:
Verizon is deep in talks to acquire Alltel, the nation's fifth largest wireless carrier, for roughly $27 billion, people close to the talks have told CNBC. Verizon has long been looked at as the ultimate purchaser of Alltel, but failed to bid when the company was auctioned in the spring of 2007. According to people involved in that auction, Verizon believed Alltel's valuation was too high.
So why now? It was less than a year ago that Alltel went private (TPG Capital and Goldman Sachs Capital were the suitors) and Verizon essentially took a pass. What about the current circumstances suddenly make it a good pickup? Perhaps Verizon was intrigued by reports that suggest Alltel's revenues grew by a respectable 11% in the first quarter and that it added close to one million new subscribers in the period. That’s a roughly 26%.
Now, the CNBC article points out that Verizon would pay about eight times EBITDA, just below the roughly 9.2 times EBITDA Alltel was reportedly bought out for. Eight times EBITDA is decent, but it doesn’t exactly exude value, nor does it seem like that much more of a deal than it was before. It stands to reason that in this environment, especially through its leverage, Verizon would be able to extract a better bargain out of those private equity types.
Actionable ideas, Instant analysis. Real-time from bell to bell.
Minyanville's Buzz and Banter- 14 day Free Trial
Another question is, if Goldman Capital and TPG are looking to unload so quickly, is there a problem that we don’t know about? That’s hard to evaluate, but nonetheless something to keep in mind. If anything, Verizon would be well served to use their haste as a bargaining chip to secure a better price.
Next, at give or take $27.5 billion Alltel is no small fish. There’s a lot that could potentially go wrong. The roughly $23 billion Reuters reports Alltel sports in debt comes to mind.
And what of the potential for cost savings and synergies? Logic dictates that when you combine two entities of this size, there’s bound to be some overlap. At the same time, however, ridding two merged companies of overlapping staff and assets can be costly, especially when you consider severance pay and write-downs. Before dropping my gavel in judgment, I’d like a sense of what this could mean in terms of dollars and cents.
Finally, if the two parties do wed, the antitrust set will probably want to have a little chat, which adds yet another variable to the equation.
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides

















