China, Starbucks Share Same Problems

Vitaliy Katsenelson  Aug 20, 2008 2:00 pm

China, Starbucks Share Same Problems
 
Both suffer from late-stage growth obesity.
 

 
China's miracle growth is largely driven by the manufacturing sector. Historically its industrial production grew at a faster rate than GDP. The manufacturing industry is very capital intensive. Building factories requires a large upfront investment. High commodity prices and rapid wage inflation has driven those costs up. Once a factory is built the costs of running it are to a large degree independent of the utilization level – they are fixed – a classical definition of operational leverage. On top of these factors, laying off workers is a politically sensitive process in China, which creates another layer of fixed costs.

High financial leverage: Debt is the instrument of choice in China. Due to a lack of equity-fund- raising alternatives (their stock market is very young), bank debt and underground finance companies that charge very high interest rates are the predominate sources of capital in China – this generates a great degree of financial leverage. (Though according to my friend Bill Mann, The Motley Fool’s advisor of Global Gains newsletter and a frequent visitor to China, state owned enterprises are much more leveraged than private enterprises.)

Total operational leverage: Large piles of debt (financial leverage) combined with high fixed costs (operational leverage) create a very high total operational leverage.

Total operational leverage in China is elevated further as factories are built to accommodate future demand – this is a classical byproduct of LGSO. It is a human tendency to draw straight lines and thus making linear projections from the past into the future. During the fast growth period the angle of the straight lines is tilted upward, causing an over investment in fixed assets, as inability to keep up with demand may cause manufacturers to lose valuable customers. (Fear of over investment is overrun by fear of losing customers.)
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (7) See All Comments »
08-20-2008, 5:41 pm
I don't see a proper comparsion. I would dare to say the author is writing just for the purpose of writing. I am not part of the clientile that would buy expensive brown liquid. To me, coffee can never be valuated at more that the cost of a m
Read More
08-20-2008, 9:55 pm
I saw a "Teach you kid Chinese" video the other day at my local library (an ocean and a continent away from China). We have old commodities traders moving to Sinapore for language lessons for their children. Eat Chinese food, it's
Read More
08-21-2008, 12:53 pm
"But I have seen no evidence that it is to take the China economy down for good."

Let me start with acknowledging that I don't claim to know how this will turn out. With that said here are some items of evidence:

Read More
08-21-2008, 1:32 pm
.. StarBucks sells its relatively high priced products to those with excess discretionary income, a group of people dwindling right now... thus hurting StarBucks business model...

.. As the richest country in the world loaded with and se
Read More
08-21-2008, 3:15 pm
"Can China continue to grow" is the wrong question. China's state-run quasi-capitalist economic scheme may well experience negative growth by some Western measure, yet still be growing with respect to their government's inter
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert