China, Starbucks Share Same Problems

Vitaliy Katsenelson  Aug 20, 2008 2:00 pm

China, Starbucks Share Same Problems
 
Both suffer from late-stage growth obesity.
 

 
Analyzing the Chinese economy while it's growing at superfast rates is like analyzing a credit card company or a mortgage originator during an economic expansion – all you see is reward – the growth. But the defaults – the risk – are masked by a healthy economy and constantly increasing new business that is profitable at first. The true colors of that growth only appear after the economy slows down and new accounts mature. (In fact, the banks or credit card companies in the US that showed the lowest loan growth during last expansionary cycle have a lot fewer credit problems than those that did – US Bank Co. comes to mind here.)

The consequences of LSGO are likely to be very painful for China. As of today we don’t know how much of the recent growth came from wasteful, unproductive growth. Only after a slowdown will the true problems surface.

Speed: What makes things even worse is that China cannot afford a slow down. I discussed this in the past but it's worth repeating. The Chinese economy is like the bus from the movie Speed. In the movie the bus is wired by a villain (played by Dennis Hopper) with explosives, and will explode if its speed drops below 50 miles per hour. The Chinese economy has 1.3 billion unsuspecting people on board. It could blow if economic growth drops below its historical pace.

A combination of high financial and operation leverage sprinkled with past high growth rates will send this economy into a severe recession if growth rates slow down. Let me explain:
High operational leverage. China has become a de facto manufacturer for the world. With the exception of food products, it is difficult finding a product that was not, at least in part, manufactured in China. Industrial production accounts for 49% of GDP, double the rate of most developed nations (i.e. industrial production for the United States is 20.5 % of GDP, UK 18.2%, and Japan 26.5%).
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (7) See All Comments »
08-20-2008, 5:41 pm
I don't see a proper comparsion. I would dare to say the author is writing just for the purpose of writing. I am not part of the clientile that would buy expensive brown liquid. To me, coffee can never be valuated at more that the cost of a m
Read More
08-20-2008, 9:55 pm
I saw a "Teach you kid Chinese" video the other day at my local library (an ocean and a continent away from China). We have old commodities traders moving to Sinapore for language lessons for their children. Eat Chinese food, it's
Read More
08-21-2008, 12:53 pm
"But I have seen no evidence that it is to take the China economy down for good."

Let me start with acknowledging that I don't claim to know how this will turn out. With that said here are some items of evidence:

Read More
08-21-2008, 1:32 pm
.. StarBucks sells its relatively high priced products to those with excess discretionary income, a group of people dwindling right now... thus hurting StarBucks business model...

.. As the richest country in the world loaded with and se
Read More
08-21-2008, 3:15 pm
"Can China continue to grow" is the wrong question. China's state-run quasi-capitalist economic scheme may well experience negative growth by some Western measure, yet still be growing with respect to their government's inter
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert