Op-Ed: Your S&P Road Map

Minyanville Staff  Mar 10, 2009 12:30 pm

Op-Ed: Your S&P Road Map
 
Where it's been; where it will go.
 

 
Editor's Note: As an emerging-markets banking analyst, James Kostohryz has firsthand experience of banking collapses and their subsequent resolutions in Mexico, Argentina and Southeast Asia. Since leaving his position as Head of International Investments at Brazil's Banco Pactual in 2000, James has worked as an independent trader and investor.

Introduction

Some prominent commentators are warning that the S&P 500 index will collapse far beyond the recent low of 667, with some suggesting targets as low as 350-400, which would represent a decline of 41% - 48% from current levels. Other prominent commentators are predicting that the market will bottom out at or around current levels, and are saying that now is a great time for investors to buy. Given these conflicting predictions, and the current dire situation in the economy and financial markets, investors are understandably confused and fearful.


In life, when you're lost, and need to make choices about where to go and how to get there, in order to make a good decision that you can feel any degree of confidence about, it's useful to have a map so that you can determine where you are currently.

S&P 500 Index Valuation Models

In order to know whether stocks are expensive or cheap, it's useful to have a good idea of how expensive and/or cheap they've been in the past under particular circumstances.

There are myriad ways to analyze the value of stocks over time: trailing PE ratios, forward PE ratios, Tobin’s Q, P/BV, dividend yields, dividend discount models (DDMs), the “Fed Model,” earnings yield gaps, and many more. I personally track dozens of valuation methodologies and have developed several of my own.

Below, I'll present a model that applies a widely followed valuation methodology developed by Yale Professor Robert Shiller. Afterward, I'll offer one of my own proprietary models.

An S&P 500 Index Valuation Road Map: Robert Shiller's PE10

One valuation methodology that's received a good bit of attention recently has been Yale Professor Robert Shiller’s PE10. PE10 is a methodology that calculates the PE of a stock or an index based on taking the current price and dividing it by the average of the respective earnings for the past 10 years, adjusted for inflation. This methodology provides an estimate of value based on historical “normalized” earnings.

Making a calculation of normalized earnings is important because a company’s value isn't based on its earnings in any given year, but is based on its capacity to generate earnings many years into the future. Thus, it would be inadvisable to take the earnings of a company or index in boom times and use that as the basis for a valuation. Doing so ignores the fact that there will be recessions and bad times, and we need to have an idea of a company’s earnings power over an entire cycle (or several cycles).

Similarly, it would probably be foolish to value a company based on the earnings it generated during a recession because recessions don’t last forever; we need to form a reasonable expectation of what a company, or an index of companies, might be able to earn over an entire earnings cycle.

Thus, Professor Shiller applies the PE10 methodology to a powerful database of information that stretches back to 1871. In the graph below, I construct a very simple model, based exclusively on Professor Shiller’s methodology and data.



Click to enlarge
42 of 44 (95%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (44 Votes)
Comments (18) See All Comments »
03-11-2009, 6:17 pm
First, thanks for the article and taking time for a courteous response.
I didn't intend to rebut, rather my remarks were intended as more of a caveat.

Point # 2. Largely agree. No rebuttal. Longer term models tend to be high
Read More
03-12-2009, 12:18 pm
"One possible takeaway from this article might be simply that this could be a propitious time for investors to search for and potentially invest in the eventual survivors and winners."

Couldn't agree more. I think that
Read More
05-14-2009, 5:16 pm
I ran a regression analysis of Shiller's data to find any correlation between a current PE10 and future changes in S&P500 value (both actual and "real"). For periods of 1 month, 12 months, and 36 months, a current PE10 accounte
Read More
05-30-2009, 3:18 pm
I could not have agreed with you more but I noticed that after S&P reached 40% rebound we saw a longer than previous retracement thus I think when we get to 50 to 55% we shall see another recess may be summer effect. what do you think?
Read More
05-30-2009, 3:40 pm
I think the economic woes due to house prices etc had manifested itself initially when S@P dropped to 1200 relative to the then economic conditions. however, As Lehman Borthers dies the CDO CDS derivatives (insurance bets of real estate value and ot
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert