What's Behind This Bounce? Fil Zucchi Nov 13, 2007 12:45 pm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
"I Thought I Thaw A Dead Puddy Cat Bounth"
After yesterday’s seemingly routine late-day swoon, I guessed this morning would have seen a nasty gap down, some legit knee knocking, and the obligatory rally on the path toward maximum frustration. Mind you my level of confidence on that scenario had exactly $0 dollars riding on it, but it was the best Hoofy could hope for.
Not to be however, as the Minx started off in the green and is painfully trying to crawl its way out of a very steep and slippery hole. We can try to assign all kinds of reasons why the market picked today to put in a bounce, from the highly scientific “Turnaround Tuesday” theorem , to more mundane oversold indicators like the 3-day RSI on the S&P 500 (SPX) (a favorite of Prof. Goepfert), deeply oversold stochastics (not so helpful if the recent swoon represents a change of trend), or the fact that price has been hugging the lower Bollinger band for long enough to deserve a bounce. The one tell which caught my attention however, is the ratio of the SPX to the Volatility Index (VIX). I watch this closely because to the extent that lower prices engender “fear” my sense is that it is more useful to see if there are divergences between each separate level.
And lo and behold look what we have found here: even though the SPX sits meaningfully above the August lows, yesterday afternoon we actually retested those lows on the SPX/VIX ratio.
What does it mean? Empirically I don’t know (I’ve lobbed the question to Prof. Goepfert to see if his data mining comes up with anything), and even looking at the charts since 1995 (95-99, 00-04, 05-07), nothing “jumps out”. Intuitively however, I would guess that to the extent that traders are more fearful now than they were in August at lower prices, it may signal that at least from a psychological standpoint prices might deserve to bounce for longer than two hours.
We know however that psychology is only one leg of our stool, and with fundamentals uncertain at best (consumer / earnings), structural backdrop in near shambles (credit markets/over-leverage), and technicals needing to prove themselves in a big hurry, the burden seems to be squarely on Hoofy’s back until proven otherwise.
After having covered much of my outright shorts in scale over the last few days, I am inclined to use Fib retracement levels to reload Boo’s stash.
After yesterday’s seemingly routine late-day swoon, I guessed this morning would have seen a nasty gap down, some legit knee knocking, and the obligatory rally on the path toward maximum frustration. Mind you my level of confidence on that scenario had exactly $0 dollars riding on it, but it was the best Hoofy could hope for.
Not to be however, as the Minx started off in the green and is painfully trying to crawl its way out of a very steep and slippery hole. We can try to assign all kinds of reasons why the market picked today to put in a bounce, from the highly scientific “Turnaround Tuesday” theorem , to more mundane oversold indicators like the 3-day RSI on the S&P 500 (SPX) (a favorite of Prof. Goepfert), deeply oversold stochastics (not so helpful if the recent swoon represents a change of trend), or the fact that price has been hugging the lower Bollinger band for long enough to deserve a bounce. The one tell which caught my attention however, is the ratio of the SPX to the Volatility Index (VIX). I watch this closely because to the extent that lower prices engender “fear” my sense is that it is more useful to see if there are divergences between each separate level.
And lo and behold look what we have found here: even though the SPX sits meaningfully above the August lows, yesterday afternoon we actually retested those lows on the SPX/VIX ratio.
What does it mean? Empirically I don’t know (I’ve lobbed the question to Prof. Goepfert to see if his data mining comes up with anything), and even looking at the charts since 1995 (95-99, 00-04, 05-07), nothing “jumps out”. Intuitively however, I would guess that to the extent that traders are more fearful now than they were in August at lower prices, it may signal that at least from a psychological standpoint prices might deserve to bounce for longer than two hours.
We know however that psychology is only one leg of our stool, and with fundamentals uncertain at best (consumer / earnings), structural backdrop in near shambles (credit markets/over-leverage), and technicals needing to prove themselves in a big hurry, the burden seems to be squarely on Hoofy’s back until proven otherwise.
After having covered much of my outright shorts in scale over the last few days, I am inclined to use Fib retracement levels to reload Boo’s stash.
|
|||||||
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange |
|
Position in SPX, QID
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| add rss feed | free article alerts |
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
DC
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennesee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Local Guides


















