Why Single-Payer Health Care Can't Work

James Anderson  Aug 11, 2009 11:40 am

Why Single-Payer Health Care Can't Work
 
Some say this system would lead to rationing. They're right.
 

 
The visceral reaction to the Town Hall meetings on health-care reform leads me to believe that a lot of Americans feel that any single-payer system will inevitably lead to health-care rationing. And I couldn’t agree more.

Way back in the early 1980s, I started out as a pharmaceutical/biotech analyst. Back then, I was frequently asked to talk at small meetings of clients at local offices of the regional brokerage firm that I worked for.

These clients were mostly small-business owners and a big issue was dealing with health-care expenses for their employees. I'd start out the talk with a quote from the retiring first Minister of the UK National Health System. (I've tried googling him and the exact quote, but it doesn’t come up.) The quote is simple, direct, and as pertinent today as it was back in the 1950s and was very simple: "The demand for free health care is infinite." They all got it.

The people protesting now all get it. They all understand that free health care will lead to rationing. Rationing isn't starving to death, it’s “You need a hip replacement -- no problem. But the waiting list is 3 years. In the mean time, limp.” Check out the waiting lists in Canada and the UK, if you don’t believe me. If you want understand real rationing, in the UK, kidney dialysis isn't offered to people above a certain age.

There are simply not enough doctors in the US to allow everyone to have a personal physician. In reality, we do have health care for everyone, but it’s for acute health problems, not chronic problems. If you fall and break your wrist and you go to an emergency room, you get treated whether or not you have insurance. The chronic problems -- diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and so forth -- occupy much of the time a family physician spends with patients. Most of these conditions have had significant advances in treatment through prescription drugs, so let’s review some of the breakthroughs from the past 30 years.

The first breakthrough was Tagamet, the first antacid that actually reduced the production of stomach acid. Smith, Kline & French -- now GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) -- won FDA approval in 1979, and the number of people who had to have surgery for stomach ulcers rapidly declined. I believe stomach ulcer surgery was in the top-10 most frequently performed surgeries back the 1970s. You rarely ever hear of one now.

The next breakthrough was in high blood pressure. Two new classes of drugs emerged -- ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. Controlling high blood pressure became much easier with minimal side effects.

The final major breakthrough was statins -- other than antibiotics, the greatest life-prolonging drug class ever developed. Study after study show huge reductions in heart attacks and strokes from the use of statins -- Pfizer’s (PFE) Lipitor, Merck’s (MRK) Zocor and many others.

So, where does that leave us in 2009? All the breakthrough ulcers drugs are over-the-counter. All previously doctor-prescribed, now they can be purchased at your local drug store. The over-the-counter versions were approved at one-half the dosage of the prescription version. Private insurance won’t even pay for these ulcer drugs now.
28 of 48 (58%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (48 Votes)
Comments (29) See All Comments »
09-11-2009, 2:53 am
"On the other hand: We ration health care already, we're just not up front about it and frankly, it's a little random. It did not discuss the problem of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on end of life care for 1 person when
Read More
09-11-2009, 3:15 am
Your numbers vastly overstate the problem. Most estimtes put the uninsured at 10 - 15 million less than your estimate when you do not count the people in this country illegally. Some of those uninsured also choose to be, This is a very low rate an
Read More
09-11-2009, 12:53 pm
Thanks for the time and responses Amy. Good work.

I look at it this way:
If the government requires insurance companies to provide coverage, then people will only buy insurance when they need it. The insurance companies know this,
Read More
09-11-2009, 1:01 pm
Yes, I remember the 500 dollar toilet seats and 50 dollar hammers. They were custom-made devices to fit government specs, which were really written by the contractors themselves because the government employees were too lazy to do their jobs, charged
Read More
09-11-2009, 1:15 pm
I agree. Why NOT start talking about a government takeover of housing and food. Such as the Dairy industry's hold on the USDA and outlawing of farm-processed foods. How about the National Electrical Code, written by electrical contractors to in
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »RIMM »AMZN »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert