Who Gets Wachovia?

Andrew Jeffery  Oct 07, 2008 11:05 am

Who Gets Wachovia?
 
Wells Fargo, Citibank fight over troubled bank's remains.
 

 
Last week, by its own account, Wachovia (WB) was a breath away from failing. Today, 2 of the 4 biggest banks in the country are literally suing each other for the right to buy the troubled Charlotte-based lender.

In what already seems like ancient history, just weeks ago investors fretted over Wachovia's fate in the wake of Washington Mutual's dramatic collapse into the waiting arms of JPMorgan Chase (JPM).

Weighed down by a toxic balance sheet of souring mortgages, Wachovia was in trouble. A stealth bank run had begun, as firms and consumers alike hoarded cash.

Then, to the surprise of many, Citigroup (C) teamed up with the FDIC to save Wachovia from the abyss. Toting a federal backstop for its quickly eroding loan portfolio, Citi snatched up Wachovia's retail branches and various other operations for a mere $2.1 billion.

The move was surprising: Citi has plenty of troubles of its own. Once the largest financial company in the world, Citi has become a poster child for mortgage and credit troubles - it didn't need to go out and buy any more.

At the time, many puzzled over Wells Fargo's (WFC) reluctance to step into the fray, as Wachovia's footprint out East seemed a perfect fit with Wells' strong presence in the West.

But then last Friday, in a stunning development, Wells stepped in with what appeared to be a far superior offer. Rather than dumping a chunk of Wachovia's risky loan portfolio on taxpayers via the FDIC, Wells not only upped the purchase price to $15 billion, but shunned government money to complete the transaction.

You could almost hear the lawyers licking their chops for high drama in the New York courts.

Citi claimed Wells had unfairly infringed on its right to buy Wachovia, that their agreement prevented other suitors from upping the ante.

Wells, for its part, found a loophole, asserting that the newly minted bailout package -- just hours old -- contained a clause allowing it to make a legal counteroffer.

Accusations flew, motions were filed, and judges, courts, attorneys and bankers dug in for a bloody fight.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (2) See All Comments »
10-07-2008, 12:25 pm
The Feds need to step aside on this oneand applaud the private sector for healing thyself, and let Wachovia and Wells do their do! This is a deal BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE ! Gee seems i've heard that phrase some where before, hmmmmm let m
Read More
10-07-2008, 2:57 pm
As long as this legal battle persists, Wachovia will continue to hemmorhage customers, further diminishing the value of the franchise. Carve up the branch network, divvy the spoils, let the vultures dine on the carrion, but be done with it already. I
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert