Why Should I Care?: Lehman Brothers

Minyanville Staff  Sep 16, 2008 1:15 pm

Why Should I Care?: Lehman Brothers
 
Like shooting finance in a barrel.
 

 

Of all the days for your air conditioner to break.

Late, as usual, you weave past slower commuters, driven by the promise of a cool subway car - an icebox in an otherwise sweltering city.

As the train makes its way down the dirty tracks, fellow straphangers sway, bumping into you with alarming frequency. Craning your neck, you can barely make out the lucky few who managed to claim a seat: A construction worker with dusty boots and stained jeans, mouth agape and snoring soundly; a nurse in scrubs and sneakers.



How many bedpans would he change by the time you finished your second cup of coffee?

Then an odd combination: A janitor, nametag and all, chatting casually with a banker, his profession worn proudly on his pinstriped sleeve. What could these guys possibly have in common?

“Have you heard when they’ll make the announcement?”

“No. Nothing. Radio silence from the CEO.”

“Hell of a day to work at Lehman Brothers (LEH).”


“You said it.”

Minyanville's Why Wall Street Will Never Be the Same It’s easy to file the collapse of a major investment bank under “good riddance” - fitting comeuppance for some greedy traders who tore the moral fabric of this country in the name of their year-end bonus.

Why should anyone care if a few rich guys at Merrill Lynch (MER) lose their jobs because their firm made so many bad bets it had to sell itself to Bank of America (BAC) in a hastily thrown together weekend deal?

Even if you aren’t interested in doling out empathy for any of the 25,000 Lehman employees -- a precious number of whom were party to the reckless risk-taking that led to the firm’s demise -- viewing the turmoil on Wall Street as confined to the narrow streets of lower Manhattan is to misunderstand the vital role these financial institutions play in our economy.

Is there another Lehman Brothers out there?
Minyanville's Buzz & Banter - 14 day FREE trial

Consider the employees at Blowtorch, a startup movie studio that takes flyers on independent filmmakers. The company raised $50 million dollars late last year, a good chunk of which came from an unnamed hedge fund. It hired editors, graphic designers and countless other artistic types who couldn’t dissect a balance sheet or model a mortgage prepayment if their lives depended on it - and liked it that way.

Then, just this April, the hedge fund decided to pull out, leaving Blowtorch on the ropes. It laid off most of its new employees and scaled back considerably. The credit crunch, 3000 miles away from sunny California, claimed a group of victims who played no role whatsoever in its creation.

Fortress Investments (FIG), one of the first hedge funds to go public, is a major source of capital for Hollywood movie studios, which borrow tens of millions of dollars to churn out the summer blockbusters hoards of regular Americans watch each summer. So far Fortress has weathered the crisis better than most, but, were it to fall on hard times, there’s a good chance we’d have fewer big-ticket event films in the coming years.

Investment banks like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) finance projects not just around the country, but around the world - everything from apartment buildings in China to cement factories in India. The company also employs tens of thousands of Americans, many of whom sweep floors, file files and have no idea about the firm’s strategic direction.

Leverage -- cheap leverage especially -- played a significant role in allowing these firms to get as big as they did, make as much money as they did. Imagine what you could accomplish if you were able to borrow $24 for every dollar in your bank account - much the way Lehman did. A correction is underway, and it’s far from over.

Many would argue this is a welcome development -- and it probably is -- but the road to healthy, economic expansion will be traversed in painful steps.

These firms will contract and rein in their massive economic exploits, the effects of which will ripple around the world and contribute to the ongoing economic slowdown. Jobs will be lost, expansion plans will be postponed and retirement accounts will suffer.

The banker and the janitor have more in common than you think.

Rate this article: (0 Votes)
Comments (6) See All Comments »
09-16-2008, 1:27 pm
The other fundamental fact is that "Smoke and mirrors" is easier than creating real value. It is only when you focus on creating real value that the money comes in.

P.S.

I was talking with a retired friend ov
Read More
09-16-2008, 2:06 pm
I'd like to see the Fed RAISE the rate 1/8 pt to send a message. It's time the rich bailed themselves out. Seniors (I am not one) who lived off of CDs are once again reeling because banks have been playing a little bit too much with their
Read More
09-17-2008, 7:26 am
First, I do have a ton of sympathy for "ordinary joes" at Lehman who lost their jobs.

I have to admit, though, that the examples of why Lehman is such a loss are a little weird. In a more normal credit environment, should co
Read More
09-18-2008, 5:13 pm
Hi Amy,

You're right, the easy money of the credit boom certainly helped companies like Blowtorch raise buckets of money.

The idea isn't necessarily whether we should be have empathy for various people who lose
Read More
06-13-2009, 5:10 pm
There have been a whole series of articles lately about what the down-scaling of Wall St. means to the regular folk/small biz owners. One profiled a waitress who used to make 80K a year at some high-end sushi place where there were sometimes 30K tabs
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any article or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Markets

our professors

rss article alert