GM, Chrysler Hit Taxpayers Up for $10 Billion

Andrew Jeffery  Oct 29, 2008 10:40 am

GM, Chrysler Hit Taxpayers Up for $10 Billion
 
Money would facilitate merger, plant closings - and layoffs.
 

 
There’s a disturbing pattern emerging in Washington’s merry-go-round of bailouts:

1. Congress pleads with taxpayers to support bailing out a troubled industry;

2.
Taxpayers rightly demand to know what their hard-earned money will be used for;

3.
Congress chooses expenditures that are palatable to constituents (new lending, protecting deposits, investing in renewable energy, etc.);

4.
Congress doles out money, neglects to describe rationale to taxpayers.

In recent weeks, it’s become evident that the $125 billion being invested in banks isn’t likely to jump-start lending anytime soon, as we were told it would. Instead, it’s paying for mergers and executive bonuses.

Now, the $25 billion earmarked for low-interest loans to the auto industry for renewable energy projects is likewise being diverted from its proposed goal.

According to the Wall Street Journal, General Motors (GM) and Chrysler LLC are lobbying the Bush administration to siphon off a portion of the bailout money to help fund their proposed merger. Chrysler, which is majority-owned by hedge fund Cerberus Capital Management, would end up being gobbled up by GM in a complex deal that would require about $10 billion to cover integration expenses.

Integration expenses, translated into layman’s terms, means layoffs and plant closures.

To be sure, neither firm is exactly flush with cash, nor are they in terribly good standing with their creditors; the deal would help shore up the financial position of both.

Monday, Moody’s Investors Services (MCO), the ratings agency Professor Jeff Macke colorfully described as “a bunch of sub-par analysts with the ability to make press releases and the power to kill any company in America,” lowered its ratings on both GM and Chrysler. Moody’s fears liquidity will continue to deteriorate, and that both firms could face cash crunches next year.

Ford (F), the third of Detroit's 3 troubled auto-makers, has seen its debt fall well into "junk" territory, and is on review for further possible downgrades.

Chrysler, for its part, is no stranger to the government dole. In 1979, the company petitioned Washington for over $1 billion in government-backed loans to prevent bankruptcy. Touted as a success, the bailout resulted in massive losses for creditors and layoffs of around 50% of its workforce. It did, however, keep the company alive…so it could go on to build millions of gas-guzzling SUVs.

Unfortunately, economic conditions in both the auto and financial industries have deteriorated such that, without government assistance, both would be doomed to collapse. Even with government funding, however, the result may not be much different.
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (6) See All Comments »
10-29-2008, 11:08 am
The government caused the problems with the US auto manufacturers and now are OBLIGATED to fix them.

The federal government requires that US based manufacturers build low-profit small cars in the US. The import companies can build their
Read More
10-29-2008, 11:18 am


The big three pay pensions and health care for nearly 2 million people. If the big three go under, the taxpayers will, I'm sure, be pleased to help out by putting these fellow citizens into govenment--that is, taxpayer funded--pen
Read More
10-29-2008, 11:43 am
"...Additionally, if the big three go under, their suppliers-..."

Nope, none of that would happen. If they 'go under' the stockholders, lose, the bond holders lose, but some bondholder wind up owning the companies
Read More
10-29-2008, 11:54 am
That's my point.

When is the American family "too big to fail"?

Bailouts are like methadone or a bumper of beer or flask of whiskey; "just a little to keep 'em going" without addressing th
Read More
10-29-2008, 12:11 pm
These government bailouts are becoming ridiculous. Chrysler should have closed up in the late seventies like other auto companies that did not make it. Giving money away with no regulation and tracking is and has never been a solution to any proble
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert