The Un-Credible Fed

William Fleckenstein  Feb 25, 2008 1:45 pm

The Un-Credible Fed
 
Problems too big to bailout.
 

 



The other day I was musing that perhaps the Fed has lost the bond market. Meaning that the Fed is understood to be fueling inflationary fires, and even though it can take short rates down, it won't be able to affect long rates.

Of course, making a statement like that is always bold, because you're never going to know if it's true until well down the road. And, even though that statement may look like it's true in the short run, it may in fact not be.

That said, I've been struck by the media's recognition (finally) that we have an inflation problem. And, given its understanding that the Fed is clearly in a box -- destined to ease (in an attempt to stave off economic weakness), while continuing to honor the Greenspan put (as far as equities go) -- folks are now beginning to realize that the Fed's predicament will only increase the inflationary pressures.

Of course, the Fed will say that if the economy weakens, it will take pressure off inflation. And, a tanking of world GDP would do that to some degree. But this would only be of limited help. A serious amount of economic weakness would be needed to counteract the money-printing that has chased the price of almost everything higher. This is the psychological component that Jim Grant called "money of the mind" (which he wrote about so eloquently in his book of the same title).

It takes many years for a certain psychological mindset to plant roots, and generally that state of mind is resistant to change. But it does appear that psychology regarding inflation has changed, and that the Fed is in the process of losing the bond market. One has only to look at the explosive rise in 30-year fixed-rate mortgages to see that the Fed' campaign of easing has backfired. A knowledgeable friend in that business tells me this is one of the worst periods ever, as those rates have just rocketed higher, even as the Fed has eased.

Greenspan and the Fed created this mess by picking the wrong interest rate -- and by continually bailing out every problem created by excess money-printing with more excess money-printing. But we're finally at the moment in time where the problems are too big to bail out (periodic upside flurries in stocks and belief in magic wands notwithstanding).
Rate this article:  (0 Votes)
Comments (4) See All Comments »
02-25-2008, 2:03 pm
Bill,

Thanks for your article.

This seems to be the opposite of Greenspan's "conundrum" of a few years ago, that while he was raising short term rates, long term rates actually went down.

I s
Read More
02-26-2008, 12:26 am

glad to see the opposite side of the deflationista argument here.

technically, inflation is here and more is staring us all in the face.

so why do so many writers on this board hunt for the magic beans of deflation?
Read More
02-26-2008, 10:29 am
The first person that I read that predicted this was Mish. When the Fed started cutting, he pointed to the yield spreads, mortgages and TIPS (maybe, or it could have been someone else that agreed with him that looked at TIPS) and concluded that it wa
Read More
02-26-2008, 6:03 pm
Though it's easy to criticize the actions of the Fed, it might be remembered that the nature of this beast has always been to promote financial socialism, for better or worse. It was constructed as such.

From a perspective of view
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »RIMM »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert