Who's Afraid of the Big Bad BRICs?

James Kostohryz  Jun 17, 2009 11:54 am

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad BRICs?
 
These countries have nothing to do with essential soundness of the US dollar.
 

 
Professor Lewis is correct when he says that the status quo of massive trade imbalances favoring BRIC nations cannot persist indefinitely, and the current political posturing by the Chinese and the Russians might just accelerate the unraveling of these imbalances.

However, the course of events to come is unlikely to follow the story line put forth in the Financial Times article. In particular, China will soon be forced to abandon their beggar-thy-neighbor policy of manipulating their currency at will in order to engineer massive trade surpluses to the detriment of the US and the rest of the industrialized world. The more intelligent Chinese leaders know this, and they're trying to gain as much leverage as they can before the boom is lowered.

Ending the Chinese currency-manipulation gig will, of course, have a secondary effect: It will cut the Chinese down to size, economically and politically. And when this happens, the commodity bubble driven by unsustainable Chinese growth -- which Russia and Brazil have been benefiting from -- will deflate.

By shrinking or eliminating the trade imbalance with the Chinese, the US’s current account deficit will cease to be an important issue, and US dollar dominance, for good or ill, will tend to consolidate.

What many people don't realize is that, with the exception of China, the US trade position is quite competitive vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Furthermore, the soundness of the US’s financial system is enviable within the OECD and the world as a whole.

The logic of global capital flows speaks very clearly. The Chinese predatory mercantilist policy that's at the very heart of global economic imbalances is unsustainable, and its days are numbered. As a result, contrary to popular belief, Chinese political and economic influence in the world is set to decline in the medium term, not rise.

The same is true of the kleptocratic Russian regime that's presiding over a basket-case economy based on a precipitously shrinking natural-resource base, a dysfunctional economic and political culture, and a suicidal demography.

Some people think the posturing of the BRICs (particularly the Chinese and the Russians) has something to do with the relative soundness of the US dollar. In my opinion, they could not be more wrong.
36 of 45 (80%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (45 Votes)
Comments (16) See All Comments »
06-18-2009, 11:46 am
James is correct. One overlooked but relevant item is that China needs the U.S. consumer market for its exports. Conversely, many U.S. companies are merely "reimporting" many of the goods that they are having manufactured in China. A drop
Read More
06-18-2009, 5:32 pm
not sure what i can make of this title i came up with, but i like it, and i like this article -

the dollar, as they say on "so you think you can dance" is buck - oh, it "is" the buck ;-)

and yes, i&
Read More
06-18-2009, 8:23 pm
There are plenty of theories to go around, but considering which country has savings, is producing, well-employed, and making products high in worldwide demand.... vs. the country which is spending beyond its means, significantly unemployed, asking
Read More
06-19-2009, 8:09 am
James' article and several comments followed typify the wishful thinking regarding China's rise.

It is not a disaster for China if Chinese decide to consume their own goods instead of sending them to US. And I found the clai
Read More
06-19-2009, 11:00 am

And just what is your evidence that the U.S. ISN'T a nation of morons?


Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
F »AMZN »HIG »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert